Ranee Thakar

10.3k total citations
212 papers, 6.2k citations indexed

About

Ranee Thakar is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Surgery and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Ranee Thakar has authored 212 papers receiving a total of 6.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 180 papers in Rheumatology, 152 papers in Surgery and 31 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Ranee Thakar's work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (178 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (110 papers) and Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (74 papers). Ranee Thakar is often cited by papers focused on Pelvic floor disorders treatments (178 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (110 papers) and Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (74 papers). Ranee Thakar collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Ranee Thakar's co-authors include Abdul H. Sultan, Vasanth Andrews, Anne-Marie Roos, Peter W. Jones, Isaac Manyonda, Zeelha Abdool, Stuart L. Stanton, Peter Clarkson, Susan Ayers and K. van Delft and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet and Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Ranee Thakar

200 papers receiving 6.0k citations

Peers

Ranee Thakar
Victoria L. Handa United States
Abdul H. Sultan United Kingdom
Cathryn Glazener United Kingdom
Kimberly Kenton United States
Dee E. Fenner United States
Emily S. Lukacz United States
Jerry L. Lowder United States
Cheryl B. Iglesia United States
Elizabeth R. Mueller United States
Victoria L. Handa United States
Ranee Thakar
Citations per year, relative to Ranee Thakar Ranee Thakar (= 1×) peers Victoria L. Handa

Countries citing papers authored by Ranee Thakar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ranee Thakar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ranee Thakar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ranee Thakar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ranee Thakar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ranee Thakar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ranee Thakar. The network helps show where Ranee Thakar may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ranee Thakar

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ranee Thakar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ranee Thakar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ranee Thakar. Ranee Thakar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Siddiqui, Farah, Rehan Ullah Khan, Susan J. Ward, et al.. (2023). A race to the finish line. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist. 25(2). 92–96. 1 indexed citations
2.
Thakar, Ranee, et al.. (2023). UK survey of colorectal surgeons on the management of acute obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Colorectal Disease. 26(1). 130–136. 1 indexed citations
3.
Okeahialam, Nicola Adanna, et al.. (2022). Mediolateral/lateral episiotomy with operative vaginal delivery and the risk reduction of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI): A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Urogynecology Journal. 33(6). 1393–1405. 21 indexed citations
4.
Dwyer, Lucy, Carol Bugge, Suzanne Hagen, et al.. (2022). Theoretical and practical development of the TOPSY self-management intervention for women who use a vaginal pessary for pelvic organ prolapse. Trials. 23(1). 742–742. 5 indexed citations
5.
Bidwell, Posy, Louise Silverton, Jan van der Meulen, et al.. (2021). OASI2: a cluster randomised hybrid evaluation of strategies for sustainable implementation of the Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury Care Bundle in maternity units in Great Britain. Implementation Science. 16(1). 55–55. 12 indexed citations
6.
Muller, Patrick, Ipek Gurol‐Urganci, Ranee Thakar, et al.. (2021). Impact of a mid‐urethral synthetic mesh sling on long‐term risk of systemic conditions in women with stress urinary incontinence: a national cohort study. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 129(4). 664–670. 6 indexed citations
7.
Okeahialam, Nicola Adanna, et al.. (2020). Early re-suturing of dehisced obstetric perineal wounds: A 13-year experience. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 254. 69–73. 7 indexed citations
8.
Okeahialam, Nicola Adanna, et al.. (2020). Transperineal and endovaginal ultrasound for evaluating suburethral masses: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 57(6). 999–1005. 5 indexed citations
9.
Pandeva, Ivilina, et al.. (2020). Association between 3D endovaginal and 2D perineal pelvic floor ultrasound findings and symptoms in women presenting with mid‐urethral sling complications. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 57(4). 639–646. 3 indexed citations
10.
Thakar, Ranee, et al.. (2020). Management of subsequent pregnancies following fourth-degree obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 250. 80–85. 6 indexed citations
11.
Sultan, Abdul H., et al.. (2020). Review of available national guidelines for obstetric anal sphincter injury. International Urogynecology Journal. 31(11). 2247–2259. 26 indexed citations
12.
Sultan, Abdul H., et al.. (2020). A one-stop perineal clinic: our eleven-year experience. International Urogynecology Journal. 31(11). 2317–2326. 23 indexed citations
13.
Gurol‐Urganci, Ipek, Posy Bidwell, Nick Sevdalis, et al.. (2020). Impact of a quality improvement project to reduce the rate of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a multicentre study with a stepped‐wedge design. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 128(3). 584–592. 41 indexed citations
14.
Sultan, Abdul H., et al.. (2019). Autologous rectus fascial slings for stress urinary incontinence: can we see them on ultrasound?. International Urogynecology Journal. 31(2). 415–417.
15.
Sultan, Abdul H., et al.. (2019). The consequences of undiagnosed obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) following vaginal delivery. International Urogynecology Journal. 31(3). 635–641. 28 indexed citations
16.
Knight, Marian, Virginia Chiocchia, Christopher Partlett, et al.. (2019). Intravenous co-amoxiclav to prevent infection after operative vaginal delivery: the ANODE RCT. Health Technology Assessment. 23(54). 1–54. 5 indexed citations
17.
Balachandran, Aswini, et al.. (2017). Are obstetric outcomes affected by female genital mutilation?. International Urogynecology Journal. 29(3). 339–344. 22 indexed citations
18.
Sultan, Abdul H., et al.. (2016). Reducing obstetric anal sphincter injuries using perineal support: our preliminary experience. International Urogynecology Journal. 28(3). 381–389. 39 indexed citations
19.
Beggs, Andrew D., et al.. (2014). Can the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) be predicted using a risk-scoring system?. BMC Research Notes. 7(1). 471–471. 56 indexed citations
20.
Thakar, Ranee, et al.. (2005). Management of urinary incontinence in the older female patient. Research Repository (Kingston University London). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026