Mark Field

1.7k citations
72 papers · 942 indexed · h-index 16

Mark Field

66 papers receiving 905 citations

Peers

Mark Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 430
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 553
  • Emergency Medicine 87
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 45
  • Surgery 342
Replace Suvro Sett with:
Suvro Sett Canada
Peter Tesar Australia
John Burman United Kingdom
M Turina Switzerland
Stephen M. Langley United States
Tomáš Holubec Germany
Paolo Pepino Italy
Anthony L. Moulton United States
Ehsan Natour Netherlands
Liam Weaver United States
Mark Field relative to Suvro Sett Canada Suvro Sett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Suvro Sett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Field. The network helps show where Mark Field may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Field Line = papers co-authored together Mark Field links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20213
3 20210
4 202013
5 202013
6 20202
7 201915
8 20181
9 201612
10 201513
11 201412
12 20142
13 20112
14 20104
15 20101
16 200821
17 200814
18 200514
19 19992
20 19969

About Mark Field

Mark Field is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Surgery and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 72 papers that have together received 942 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (45 papers), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (31 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (18 papers), Trauma Management and Diagnosis (11 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (9 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (9 papers), Infectious Aortic and Vascular Conditions (8 papers) and Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (430 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (553 citations), Emergency Medicine (87 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (45 citations) and Surgery (342 citations). Mark Field has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Aung Oo, Manoj Kuduvalli, Deborah Harrington, Thomas Theologou, Shi Sum Poon, David Richens, Mohamad Bashir, Fionula M. Brennan, Marc Feldmann and Cong‐Qiu Chu. Their work appears in journals such as Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery and Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026