Mark Fiecas
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Hernando OmbaoMing T. TsuangMichael C. NealeCarol E. FranzLisa T. EylerMatthew S. PanizzonChristine Fennema‐NotestineMichael J. Lyons
- Topics
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (28 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (15 papers)Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (9 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of the American Statistical Association
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFinland
In The Last Decade
Mark Fiecas
67 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
- Cognitive Neuroscience 570
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 246
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 190
- Psychiatry and Mental health 141
- Clinical Psychology 125
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Fiecas
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Fiecas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Fiecas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Fiecas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Fiecas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Fiecas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Fiecas. The network helps show where Mark Fiecas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Fiecas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Fiecas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Fiecas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Fiecas. Mark Fiecas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 28 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 28 |
About Mark Fiecas
Mark Fiecas is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 76 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (28 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (15 papers) and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (570 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (190 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (31 citations). Mark Fiecas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Hernando Ombao, Ming T. Tsuang, Michael C. Neale, Carol E. Franz, Lisa T. Eyler, Matthew S. Panizzon, Christine Fennema‐Notestine, Michael J. Lyons, Anders M. Dale and William S. Kremen. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of the American Statistical Association.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.