Mark F. Yeckel
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 19
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research 3
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms 11
- Neural dynamics and brain function 3
- Developmental Neuroscience top 2%
- Neurology top 5%
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 5%
-
- Ion channel regulation and function 4
- Retinal Development and Disorders 3
- Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling 3
-
- Cellular transport and secretion 3
Mark F. Yeckel
25 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.9k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.3k
- Developmental Neuroscience 185
- Neurology 268
- Behavioral Neuroscience 93
Countries citing papers authored by Mark F. Yeckel
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark F. Yeckel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark F. Yeckel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark F. Yeckel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark F. Yeckel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark F. Yeckel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark F. Yeckel. The network helps show where Mark F. Yeckel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark F. Yeckel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 22 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 55 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 60 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 87 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 54 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 30 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 117 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 95 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 40 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 21 | |
| 15 | Requirement for Hippocampal CA3 NMDA Receptors in Associative Memory Recallbreakdown → | 2002 | 802 |
| 16 | 2001 | 77 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 254 | |
| 18 | 1996 | 66 | |
| 19 | 1995 | 29 | |
| 20 | 1993 | 26 |
About Mark F. Yeckel
Mark F. Yeckel is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 25 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (19 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (11 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (3 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (3 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers) and Cellular transport and secretion (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.9k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.3k citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (185 citations). Mark F. Yeckel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Johnston, Theodore W. Berger, A. Kapur, C. A. Carr, Akira Kato, Raymond A. Chitwood, Matthew A. Wilson, Kazu Nakazawa, Susumu Tonegawa and Masahiko Watanabe. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Journal of Neurophysiology, Neuroscience, The Journal of Physiology and Hippocampus.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.