Mark F. Swift

761 total citations
23 papers, 488 citations indexed

About

Mark F. Swift is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Molecular Biology and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark F. Swift has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 488 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Cell Biology, 13 papers in Molecular Biology and 10 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Mark F. Swift's work include Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (9 papers) and Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications (5 papers). Mark F. Swift is often cited by papers focused on Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (9 papers) and Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications (5 papers). Mark F. Swift collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Australia. Mark F. Swift's co-authors include Niels Volkmann, Dorit Hanein, Xiaoping Xu, Karen Anderson, Christopher Page, David R. Critchley, Eldar Kim, Petra Kopp, Igor Barsukov and Jeffrey W. Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and Blood.

In The Last Decade

Mark F. Swift

23 papers receiving 478 citations

Peers

Mark F. Swift
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Cell Biology 226
  • Molecular Biology 220
  • Immunology and Allergy 114
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 90
  • Hematology 45
Replace Christian M. Gawden‐Bone with:
Christian M. Gawden‐Bone United Kingdom
Eldar Kim United States
Masahiro Maruoka Japan
H. Ike Japan
Simona Sorrentino Switzerland
Svetla Stoilova‐McPhie United States
Anaïs Bouissou France
Marjolein B.M. Meddens Netherlands
Wanzhong He China
Roshni Basu United States
Christian M. Gawden‐Bone United Kingdom View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Mark F. Swift
Mark F. Swift · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Mark F. Swift
Mark F. Swift · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Mark F. Swift

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark F. Swift's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark F. Swift with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark F. Swift more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark F. Swift

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark F. Swift. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark F. Swift. The network helps show where Mark F. Swift may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark F. Swift

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark F. Swift. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark F. Swift based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark F. Swift. Mark F. Swift is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 3
2 2
3 3
4 19
5 1
6 2
7 18
8 54
9 11
10 21
11 28
12 27
13 14
14 1
15 48
16 16
17 13
18 30
19 90
20 3

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026