Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Acromegaly: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline
20141.2k citationsLaurence Katznelson, Edward R. Laws et al.The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolismprofile →
Prevalence of abnormal serum vitamin D, PTH, calcium, and phosphorus in patients with chronic kidney disease: Results of the study to evaluate early kidney disease
Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Molitch
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Molitch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Molitch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Molitch more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Molitch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Molitch. The network helps show where Mark E. Molitch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark E. Molitch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark E. Molitch.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark E. Molitch based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark E. Molitch. Mark E. Molitch is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Chamberlin, Michael J., et al.. (2015). Qualitative Analysis of Key Informant Interviews to Establish Barriers And Solutions for Diabetes Care In a Rural Bolivian Clinic. 5(3).1 indexed citations
8.
Molitch, Mark E.. (2013). Current state of type 2 diabetes management.. PubMed. 19(8 Suppl). S136–42.9 indexed citations
Мелмед, Шломо, Annamaria Colao, Ariel L. Barkan, et al.. (2009). Guidelines for Acromegaly Management: An Update. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 94(5). 1509–1517.549 indexed citations breakdown →
Gillam, Mary P., Hugo Fideleff, Hugo Boquete, & Mark E. Molitch. (2004). Prolactin excess: treatment and toxicity.. PubMed. 2 Suppl 1. 108–14.10 indexed citations
14.
Steffes, Michael W., Mark E. Molitch, Blanche M. Chavers, Patricia A. Cleary, & John M. Lachin. (2003). Sustained effect of intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus on the development and progression of diabetic nephropathy in epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications (EDIC) study.. JAMA. 290(16).41 indexed citations
Wolpert, Samuel M., Mark E. Molitch, James A. Goldman, & James B. Wood. (1984). Size, Shape, and Appearance of the Normal Female Pituitary Gland. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 5(3). 263–267.19 indexed citations
20.
McCarron, David A., et al.. (1978). The effect of chronic beta-adrenergic blockade on parathormone (PTH) secretion in subjects with essential hypertension. Clinical research. 26(2).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.