Mark E. Lutman

3.4k total citations
106 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

Mark E. Lutman is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark E. Lutman has authored 106 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 88 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 52 papers in Sensory Systems and 36 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in Mark E. Lutman's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (86 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (52 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (36 papers). Mark E. Lutman is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (86 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (52 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (36 papers). Mark E. Lutman collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Mark E. Lutman's co-authors include Sue Archbold, Thomas P. Nikolopoulos, Adrian Davis, Sue Gregory, Kevin J. Munro, Ciarán O’Neill, Srikanta K. Mishra, Lucy Yardley, Melanie Ferguson and Tracey Sach and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of neurosurgery and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

In The Last Decade

Mark E. Lutman

104 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Mark E. Lutman	2.1k	1.3k	992	511	402	106	2.7k
Manuel Manrique	2.1k 1.0×	1.5k 1.1×	625 0.6×	373 0.7×	274 0.7×	148	2.8k
Fred H. Bess	3.1k 1.5×	1.9k 1.5×	1.4k 1.4×	1.2k 2.3×	278 0.7×	100	4.2k
Susan Jerger	2.0k 1.0×	816 0.6×	563 0.6×	730 1.4×	281 0.7×	90	2.8k
Anthony T. Cacace	2.0k 1.0×	1.5k 1.2×	524 0.5×	294 0.6×	689 1.7×	89	2.9k
Frederick J. Gallun	2.4k 1.2×	1.0k 0.8×	1.2k 1.2×	223 0.4×	133 0.3×	126	2.8k
Stig Arlinger	3.2k 1.5×	1.5k 1.2×	1.9k 1.9×	559 1.1×	442 1.1×	126	4.0k
Anne Marie Tharpe	1.8k 0.9×	1.1k 0.8×	531 0.5×	755 1.5×	140 0.3×	73	2.2k
Cas Smits	2.2k 1.1×	1.3k 1.0×	1.6k 1.6×	207 0.4×	142 0.4×	83	2.6k
Aaron C. Moberly	1.7k 0.8×	750 0.6×	1.0k 1.0×	521 1.0×	81 0.2×	149	2.3k
Teresa A. Zwolan	2.4k 1.2×	1.4k 1.1×	833 0.8×	780 1.5×	71 0.2×	72	2.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Lutman

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Lutman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Lutman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Lutman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Lutman

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Lutman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Lutman. The network helps show where Mark E. Lutman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark E. Lutman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark E. Lutman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark E. Lutman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark E. Lutman. Mark E. Lutman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Lutman, Mark E., John de Carpentier, & Kevin Green. (2024). Guidelines for Diagnosis of Noise‐Induced Hearing Loss and Their Specificity. Clinical Otolaryngology. 50(3). 446–455. 1 indexed citations

Ferguson, Melanie, et al.. (2019). A simple method to estimate noise levels in the workplace based on self-reported speech communication effort in noise. International Journal of Audiology. 58(7). 450–453. 11 indexed citations

Hu, Hongmei, et al.. (2015). Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners. Hearing Research. 327. 175–185. 9 indexed citations

Kollmeier, Birger, Johannes Lyzenga, Tammo Houtgast, et al.. (2013). Evaluation of the preliminary auditory profile test battery in an international multi-centre study. International Journal of Audiology. 52(5). 305–321. 32 indexed citations

Hall, Amanda, Marcus Pembrey, Mark E. Lutman, Colin Steer, & Maria Bitner‐Glindzicz. (2012). Prevalence and audiological features in carriers of GJB2 mutations, c.35delG and c.101T>C (p.M34T), in a UK population study. BMJ Open. 2(4). e001238–e001238. 18 indexed citations

Hu, Hongmei, et al.. (2011). Enhanced SPARSE speech processing strategy for cochlear implants. UCL Discovery (University College London). 11 indexed citations

Parazzini, Marta, Federica Sibella, Mark E. Lutman, et al.. (2009). Effects of UMTS Cellular Phones on Human Hearing: Results of the European Project “EMFnEAR”. Radiation Research. 172(2). 244–251. 16 indexed citations

Lutman, Mark E., et al.. (2009). Measuring outcome from vestibular rehabilitation, part II: Refinement and validation of a new self-report measure. International Journal of Audiology. 48(1). 24–37. 51 indexed citations

Li, Guoping & Mark E. Lutman. (2008). Sparse stimuli for cochlear implants. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 1–5. 5 indexed citations

10.

Verschuur, Carl, et al.. (2006). Evaluation of a non-linear spectral subtraction noise suppression scheme in cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implants International. 7(4). 193–6. 14 indexed citations

11.

Rowan, Daniel J. & Mark E. Lutman. (2005). Generalisation of learning with ITD discrimination across frequency and type of cue. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 2 indexed citations

12.

Lutman, Mark E., et al.. (2005). Methodology for quantifying perceptual effects from noise suppression systems. International Journal of Audiology. 44(12). 721–732. 11 indexed citations

13.

Lutman, Mark E., et al.. (2005). Hearing threshold levels and speech recognition in noise in 7-year-olds. International Journal of Audiology. 44(8). 435–443. 27 indexed citations

14.

Lutman, Mark E., et al.. (2004). Does static ear canal pressure influence pure tone pitch perception?. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 124(3). 286–289. 2 indexed citations

15.

O’Neill, Ciarán, et al.. (2003). Parents and their cochlear implanted child: questionnaire development to assess parental views and experiences. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 68(2). 149–160. 64 indexed citations

16.

Lutman, Mark E., et al.. (2000). Nonlinear temporal interactions in click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. I. Assumed model and polarity-symmetry. Hearing Research. 146(1-2). 89–100. 18 indexed citations

17.

Lutman, Mark E. & David H. Marshall. (1997). Self-Rated Hearing Disability in Candidates for Cochlear Implants. British Journal of Audiology. 31(3). 149–152. 6 indexed citations

18.

O’Donoghue, Gerard M., et al.. (1992). The Feasibility of Using Oto-Acoustic Emissions to Monitor Cochlear Function During Acoustic Neuroma Surgery. Scandinavian Audiology. 21(3). 173–176. 18 indexed citations

19.

Lutman, Mark E.. (1992). Apportionment of noise-induced hearing disability and its prognosis in a medicolegal context: A modelling study. British Journal of Audiology. 26(5). 307–319. 4 indexed citations

20.

Lutman, Mark E., et al.. (1990). Quality Estimation of Click-evoked Oto-acoustic Emissions. Scandinavian Audiology. 19(1). 3–7. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact