Mark E. Caulfield
Impact in
-
- Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Rural development and sustainability
-
- Agricultural risk and resilience
- Land Rights and Reforms
Papers in
-
- Agricultural Innovations and Practices 6
- Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development 3
-
- Land Rights and Reforms 1
- Co-authors
- Steven J. Fonte (7 shared papers)Aad Kessler (1 shared paper)James Hammond (4 shared papers)Mark T. van Wijk (4 shared papers)Pablo Tittonell (3 shared papers)Pedro J. Oyarzún (3 shared papers)Steven J. Vanek (4 shared papers)Stephen Sherwood (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Land Degradation and Development (2 papers)Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems (2 papers)Experimental Agriculture (1 paper)Land Use Policy (1 paper)Ecosphere (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsKenya
In The Last Decade
Mark E. Caulfield
10 papers receiving 148 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60
- Soil Science 42
- Forestry 11
- Global and Planetary Change 42
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 28
Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Caulfield
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Caulfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Caulfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Caulfield more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Caulfield
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Caulfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Caulfield. The network helps show where Mark E. Caulfield may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark E. Caulfield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 73 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 14 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 2 |
About Mark E. Caulfield
Mark E. Caulfield is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Soil Science, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Forestry, having authored 10 papers that have together received 151 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agricultural Innovations and Practices (6 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (4 papers), Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (3 papers), Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems (2 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (2 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (1 paper), Land Rights and Reforms (1 paper) and Land Use and Ecosystem Services (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (60 citations), Soil Science (42 citations), Forestry (11 citations), Global and Planetary Change (42 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (28 citations). Mark E. Caulfield has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Kenya. Frequent co-authors include Steven J. Fonte, Aad Kessler, James Hammond, Mark T. van Wijk, Pablo Tittonell, Pedro J. Oyarzún, Steven J. Vanek, Stephen Sherwood, J.C.J. Groot and Simon Fraval. Their work appears in journals such as Land Degradation and Development, Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, Experimental Agriculture, Land Use Policy and Ecosphere.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.