Mark D. Lim
Impact in
- Physiology top 10%
- Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
- Parasitology top 10%
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Electron Spin Resonance Studies 3
-
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena 3
- Co-authors
- Peter C. Ford (12 shared papers)Ivan M. Lorković (4 shared papers)Bernadette Fernandez (1 shared paper)Kiyoshi Tsuge (2 shared papers)Frank DeRosa (1 shared paper)Carolyn C. Compton (2 shared papers)Charles S. Craik (2 shared papers)M. Tanaka (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical Society (4 papers)The Astrophysical Journal (3 papers)Inorganic Chemistry (2 papers)Chemical Communications (1 paper)Nano Letters (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazilBelgium
In The Last Decade
Mark D. Lim
33 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
- Physiology 295
- Parasitology 72
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 175
- Biophysics 60
- Inorganic Chemistry 135
Countries citing papers authored by Mark D. Lim
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark D. Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark D. Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark D. Lim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark D. Lim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark D. Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark D. Lim. The network helps show where Mark D. Lim may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark D. Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 143 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 137 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 104 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 95 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 87 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 74 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 70 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 52 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 49 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 47 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 45 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 39 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 37 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 30 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 29 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 28 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 23 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 19 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 18 | |
| 20 | 1994 | 18 |
About Mark D. Lim
Mark D. Lim is a scholar working on Biophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Cell Biology, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Physiology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (8 papers), Hemoglobin structure and function (6 papers), Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology (4 papers), Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (3 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (3 papers), Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (3 papers), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (3 papers) and Superconducting and THz Device Technology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (295 citations), Parasitology (72 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (175 citations), Biophysics (60 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (135 citations). Mark D. Lim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Peter C. Ford, Ivan M. Lorković, Bernadette Fernandez, Kiyoshi Tsuge, Frank DeRosa, Carolyn C. Compton, Charles S. Craik, M. Tanaka, Manabu Kawada and Helen M. Moore. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Astrophysical Journal, Inorganic Chemistry, Chemical Communications and Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.