Mark Crosby
-
- Monetary Policy and Economic Impact 16
- Economic Theory and Policy 8
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Fiscal Policies and Political Economy 6
- Economic Growth and Productivity 6
- Market Dynamics and Volatility 3
- Finance top 10%
- Global Financial Crisis and Policies 13
-
- Moravian Church and William Blake 5
-
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 3
- Journals
- The Review of English Studies (2 papers)Scandinavian Journal of Economics (1 paper)Journal of money credit and banking (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomIndonesia
In The Last Decade
Mark Crosby
28 papers receiving 286 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 123
- Economics and Econometrics 252
- Finance 84
- Management of Technology and Innovation 23
- Accounting 31
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Crosby
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Crosby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Crosby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Crosby more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Crosby
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Crosby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Crosby. The network helps show where Mark Crosby may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Mark Crosby, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 2 | Re-envisioning Blake | 2012 | 1 |
| 3 | 2011 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 5 | Can Macroeconomic Factors Explain High House Prices in Australia | 2004 | 18 |
| 6 | Chinese Economic Growth and the Australian Economy | 2004 | 1 |
| 7 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 3 | |
| 9 | The Australian Business Cycle: Joe Palooka or Dead Cat Bounce? | 2002 | 1 |
| 10 | 2002 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 13 | Non-linearities in the Singaporean business cycle | 2000 | 2 |
| 14 | 2000 | 22 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 18 | |
| 16 | 2000 | 22 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1998 | 24 | |
| 20 | 1995 | 11 |
About Mark Crosby
Mark Crosby is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Literature and Literary Theory and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 36 papers that have together received 333 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (16 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (13 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (8 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (6 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (6 papers), Moravian Church and William Blake (5 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers) and Market Dynamics and Volatility (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (123 citations), Economics and Econometrics (252 citations), Finance (84 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (23 citations) and Accounting (31 citations). Mark Crosby has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include Philip Bodman, Glenn Otto, Nilss Olekalns, Lisa Cameron and Ian O. Williamson. Their work appears in journals such as The Review of English Studies, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Journal of money credit and banking, Economics Letters and Huntington Library Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.