Mark Carey
- Finance top 0.5%
- Accounting top 1%
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Co-authors
- Steven A. SharpeRené M. StulzGregory P. NiniMichael B. GordyGreg NiniRichard J. RosenRicardo CorreaJason D. Kotter
- Topics
- Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (26 papers)Credit Risk and Financial Regulations (17 papers)Housing Market and Economics (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
Mark Carey
33 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Finance 1.3k
- Accounting 876
- Economics and Econometrics 553
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 104
- Strategy and Management 80
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Carey
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Carey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Carey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Carey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Carey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Carey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Carey. The network helps show where Mark Carey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Carey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Carey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Carey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Carey. Mark Carey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | Market Institutions and Financial Market Risk | 2 |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 96 | |
| 10 | 85 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 202 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | Taking Note of the Deposit Insurance Fund: A Plan for the FDIC to Issue Capital Notes | 14 |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | Recent Developments in the Market for Privately Placed Debt | 15 |
| 19 | Conservation and environmental issues in agriculture: An economic evaluation of policy options. Staff report | 1 |
| 20 | Feeding the fad : the Federal Land Banks, land market efficiency, and the farm credit crisis | 18 |
About Mark Carey
Mark Carey is a scholar working on Finance, Accounting and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (26 papers), Credit Risk and Financial Regulations (17 papers) and Housing Market and Economics (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (1.3k citations), Accounting (876 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (553 citations). Mark Carey has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Steven A. Sharpe, René M. Stulz, Gregory P. Nini, Michael B. Gordy, Greg Nini, Richard J. Rosen, Ricardo Correa, Jason D. Kotter, Anil Kashyap and Raghuram G. Rajan. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Finance, Journal of Financial Economics and Journal of Banking & Finance.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.