Mark C. Sparrow

637 citations
8 papers · 472 · h-index 6

Impact in

  • Spectroscopy top 10%
    • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
    • Molecular spectroscopy and chirality
  • Biophysics top 10%

Papers in

    • Protein Structure and Dynamics 1
    • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 1
    • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 3

Mark C. Sparrow

8 papers receiving 468 citations

Peers

Mark C. Sparrow
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Spectroscopy 140
  • Biophysics 46
  • Materials Chemistry 190
  • Molecular Biology 244
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 101
Replace Ali Salehi‐Reyhani with:
Ali Salehi‐Reyhani United Kingdom
Delphine Pitrat France
Ilya Strashnov United Kingdom
Bengt Nölting Germany
Michael R. Dent United Kingdom
Viviane Van den Bergh Belgium
Martin Štefl Czechia
Richard W. Bormett United States
Anastasia Loman Germany
Ali Yılmaz Türkiye
Mark C. Sparrow relative to Ali Salehi‐Reyhani United Kingdom Ali Salehi‐Reyhani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Ali Salehi‐Reyhani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark C. Sparrow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark C. Sparrow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark C. Sparrow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark C. Sparrow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark C. Sparrow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark C. Sparrow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark C. Sparrow. The network helps show where Mark C. Sparrow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark C. Sparrow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark C. Sparrow Line = papers co-authored together Mark C. Sparrow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 1999162
2 2014122
3 2001102
4 199936
5 199826
6 200119
7 20123
8 20182

About Mark C. Sparrow

Mark C. Sparrow is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biophysics and Cancer Research, having authored 8 papers that have together received 472 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (2 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (2 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (1 paper), Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (1 paper), Protein Structure and Dynamics (1 paper) and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (140 citations), Biophysics (46 citations), Materials Chemistry (190 citations), Molecular Biology (244 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (101 citations). Mark C. Sparrow has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Sanford A. Asher, Anton S. Karnoup, Igor K. Lednev, Michael McCawley, Michael L. Kashon, Kristin Bunker, Chenbo Dong, Dale W. Porter, David T. Lowry and Shih‐Houng Young. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Applied Spectroscopy, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Particle and Fibre Toxicology and Microscopy and Microanalysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact