Mark C. Navin

58 papers receiving 758 citations

Peers

Mark C. Navin
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Health 508
  • Modeling and Simulation 57
  • General Health Professions 243
  • Infectious Diseases 151
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 158
Replace Emily K. Brunson with:
Emily K. Brunson United States
Maryline Vivion Canada
Irene A. Harmsen Netherlands
Philip M. Massey United States
Robert A. Bednarczyk United States
Aglaia Katsiroumpa Greece
Rachael Piltch‐Loeb United States
Sean J. Lawrence United States
Niels Haase Germany
Ovidiu Tatar Canada
Mark C. Navin relative to Emily K. Brunson United States Emily K. Brunson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Emily K. Brunson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark C. Navin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark C. Navin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark C. Navin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark C. Navin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark C. Navin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark C. Navin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark C. Navin. The network helps show where Mark C. Navin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark C. Navin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark C. Navin Line = papers co-authored together Mark C. Navin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018107
2 201896
3 201966
4
Values and Vaccine Refusal: Hard Questions in Ethics, Epistemology, and Health Care
201540
5 201739
6 201937
7 201935
8 201830
9 202325
10 201524
11 201322
12 202218
13 201618
14 201816
15 201815
16 202113
17 202012
18 201712
19 202011
20 201711

About Mark C. Navin

Mark C. Navin is a scholar working on Health, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 64 papers that have together received 795 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (34 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (25 papers), Ethics in medical practice (14 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (10 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (7 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (7 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (6 papers) and Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (508 citations), Modeling and Simulation (57 citations), General Health Professions (243 citations), Infectious Diseases (151 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (158 citations). Mark C. Navin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Katie Attwell, Mark A. Largent, Jason Adam Wasserman, Aaron M. McCright, Dilshani Sarathchandra, Saad B. Omer, Pier Luigi Lopalco, C. Jestin, Sabine Reiter and Andrea T. Kozak. Their work appears in journals such as Vaccine, The American Journal of Bioethics, PEDIATRICS, AJOB Empirical Bioethics and Public Health Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact