Mark A. Williams

7.4k total citations
104 papers, 4.3k citations indexed

About

Mark A. Williams is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology and Soil Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark A. Williams has authored 104 papers receiving a total of 4.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 46 papers in Plant Science, 44 papers in Ecology and 41 papers in Soil Science. Recurrent topics in Mark A. Williams's work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (36 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (25 papers) and Gut microbiota and health (10 papers). Mark A. Williams is often cited by papers focused on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (36 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (25 papers) and Gut microbiota and health (10 papers). Mark A. Williams collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and India. Mark A. Williams's co-authors include Kamlesh Jangid, William B. Whitman, David D. Myrold, Peter J. Bottomley, David C. Coleman, Alan J. Franzluebbers, Charles W. Rice, Madhavi L. Kakumanu, Jessica L. Butler and Richard R. Rodrigues and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Environmental Science & Technology and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Mark A. Williams

103 papers receiving 4.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark A. Williams United States 34 1.9k 1.8k 1.4k 767 449 104 4.3k
Bruce C. Thomson United Kingdom 17 2.1k 1.1× 2.6k 1.4× 1.4k 1.0× 1.1k 1.4× 512 1.1× 20 4.7k
Thomas C. Jeffries Australia 26 1.6k 0.8× 2.4k 1.3× 1.1k 0.8× 1.0k 1.3× 418 0.9× 56 4.3k
Ashish A. Malik United Kingdom 22 2.4k 1.3× 1.9k 1.0× 941 0.7× 601 0.8× 321 0.7× 38 4.2k
Kelly S. Ramirez United States 18 2.7k 1.4× 2.7k 1.5× 1.6k 1.1× 1.1k 1.4× 435 1.0× 30 4.8k
Katharina Keiblinger Austria 27 2.7k 1.4× 1.8k 1.0× 1.2k 0.9× 498 0.6× 315 0.7× 90 4.4k
Wenju Liang China 39 3.0k 1.6× 2.0k 1.1× 2.7k 1.9× 493 0.6× 553 1.2× 143 5.4k
S. Franz Bender Switzerland 18 1.7k 0.9× 1.3k 0.7× 2.4k 1.7× 491 0.6× 567 1.3× 25 4.3k
Uffe N. Nielsen Australia 33 1.8k 0.9× 2.4k 1.3× 1.6k 1.1× 928 1.2× 870 1.9× 107 5.1k
Kari E. Dunfield Canada 40 2.0k 1.0× 1.6k 0.9× 2.4k 1.7× 944 1.2× 297 0.7× 134 5.6k
Andrew Bissett Australia 41 1.4k 0.7× 3.0k 1.6× 1.4k 1.0× 1.5k 1.9× 460 1.0× 132 5.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark A. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark A. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark A. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark A. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark A. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark A. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark A. Williams. The network helps show where Mark A. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark A. Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark A. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark A. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark A. Williams. Mark A. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Maurer, John J., Keshav C. Das, Jianrong Wu, et al.. (2025). The Impact Aerobic and Anaerobic Incubations of Poultry Litter Have on Class 1 Integron Resistome and Microbiome. Agriculture. 15(4). 398–398. 1 indexed citations
2.
Wynn‐Thompson, Theresa, et al.. (2023). Root reinforcement and extracellular products reduce streambank fluvial erosion. The Science of The Total Environment. 896. 165125–165125. 3 indexed citations
3.
Al‐Karaki, Ghazi N. & Mark A. Williams. (2021). Mycorrhizal mixtures affect the growth, nutrition, and physiological responses of soybean to water deficit. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 43(5). 13 indexed citations
5.
Bastida, Felipe, David J. Eldridge, Sebastián Abades, et al.. (2019). Climatic vulnerabilities and ecological preferences of soil invertebrates across biomes. Molecular Ecology. 29(4). 752–761. 37 indexed citations
6.
Sharaf, Hazem, et al.. (2019). Unprecedented bacterial community richness in soybean nodules vary with cultivar and water status. Microbiome. 7(1). 63–63. 57 indexed citations
7.
Wang, Qiang, Haoliang Lu, Jingyan Chen, et al.. (2019). Interactions of soil metals with glomalin-related soil protein as soil pollution bioindicators in mangrove wetland ecosystems. The Science of The Total Environment. 709. 136051–136051. 30 indexed citations
8.
Rodrigues, Richard R., et al.. (2018). COREMIC: a web-tool to search for a niche associated CORE MICrobiome. PeerJ. 6. e4395–e4395. 21 indexed citations
9.
Ma, Li, et al.. (2016). Plant – Microbial and mineral contributions to amino acid and protein organic matter accumulation during 4000 years of pedogenesis. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 100. 42–50. 14 indexed citations
10.
Jangid, Kamlesh, et al.. (2016). K-shuff: A Novel Algorithm for Characterizing Structural and Compositional Diversity in Gene Libraries. PLoS ONE. 11(12). e0167634–e0167634. 5 indexed citations
11.
Magbanua, Zenaida V., Mark A. Williams, Kamlesh Jangid, et al.. (2016). Bacterial Diversity Patterns Differ in Soils Developing in Sub-tropical and Cool-Temperate Ecosystems. Microbial Ecology. 73(3). 556–569. 14 indexed citations
12.
Yang, An, Nana Liu, Qiuying Tian, et al.. (2015). Rhizosphere bacterial communities of dominant steppe plants shift in response to a gradient of simulated nitrogen deposition. Frontiers in Microbiology. 6. 789–789. 16 indexed citations
13.
Wang, Zheng, Mark A. Williams, Krista Jacobsen, & Timothy Coolong. (2015). Impact of Tillage and Irrigation Management on Bell Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Grown in Organic and Conventional Production Systems. HortScience. 50(11). 1694–1701. 1 indexed citations
15.
Yarwood, Stephanie A., Abbey F. Wick, Mark A. Williams, & W. Lee Daniels. (2014). Parent Material and Vegetation Influence Soil Microbial Community Structure Following 30-Years of Rock Weathering and Pedogenesis. Microbial Ecology. 69(2). 383–394. 28 indexed citations
17.
Alexander, Kathleen A., Peter N. Laver, Anita L. Michel, et al.. (2010). Novel Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Pathogen, M. mungi. Emerging infectious diseases. 16(8). 1296–1299. 165 indexed citations
18.
Turley, Glen A., Mark A. Williams, & Charles Tennant. (2007). Final vehicle product audit methodologies within the automotive industry. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management. 2(1). 1–22. 7 indexed citations
19.
Winter, Matthew J., Elisabetta Garofalo, S. Ceradini, et al.. (2005). Tissue levels and biomarkers of organic contaminants in feral and caged chub (Leuciscus cephalus) from rivers in the West Midlands, UK. Aquatic Toxicology. 73(4). 394–405. 37 indexed citations
20.
Williams, Mark A. & James T. Cronin. (2004). Response of a Gall-Forming Guild (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) to Stressed and Vigorous Prairie Roses. Environmental Entomology. 33(4). 1052–1061. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026