Mark A. Clements

2.9k citations
118 papers · 1.8k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Mark A. Clements

112 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Mark A. Clements
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Signal Processing 825
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 387
  • Artificial Intelligence 753
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 277
  • Pharmacy 59
Replace Xia Mao with:
Xia Mao China
Michael Picheny United States
Chen Chen China
Xiaoming Zhao China
Sazali Yaacob Malaysia
Hong Kook Kim South Korea
Dongmei Jiang China
Nam Soo Kim South Korea
Tomoko Matsui Japan
Mark A. Clements relative to Xia Mao China Xia Mao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Xia Mao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark A. Clements

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark A. Clements's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark A. Clements with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark A. Clements more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark A. Clements

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark A. Clements. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark A. Clements. The network helps show where Mark A. Clements may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark A. Clements, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark A. Clements Line = papers co-authored together Mark A. Clements links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 118 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005184
2 2007168
3 1991163
4 2013128
5 199576
6 201664
7 200262
8 200251
9 200740
10 200237
11 201434
12 200232
13 201331
14 199731
15
Digital Signal Processing and Statistical Classification
200230
16 200230
17 199527
18 201926
19 199426
20 199125

About Mark A. Clements

Mark A. Clements is a scholar working on Signal Processing, Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 118 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Speech and Audio Processing (59 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (46 papers), Music and Audio Processing (21 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (16 papers), Advanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques (15 papers), Advanced Data Compression Techniques (14 papers), Blind Source Separation Techniques (12 papers) and Voice and Speech Disorders (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Signal Processing (825 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (387 citations), Artificial Intelligence (753 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (277 citations) and Pharmacy (59 citations). Mark A. Clements has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Azerbaijan. Frequent co-authors include John H. L. Hansen, Elliot Moore, John W. Peifer, B.A. Carlson, Michael W. Macon, Teresa H. Sanders, R.M. Mersereau, Rebecca J. Sheesley, D. R. Blake and Eric S. Edgerton. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing and ETRI Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact