8.6k total citations 71 papers, 733 citations indexed
About
Mario Novak is a scholar working on Archeology, Genetics and Paleontology.
According to data from OpenAlex, Mario Novak has authored 71 papers receiving a total of 733 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 55 papers in Archeology, 20 papers in Genetics and 8 papers in Paleontology. Recurrent topics in Mario Novak's work include Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (46 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (19 papers) and Paleopathology and ancient diseases (12 papers). Mario Novak is often cited by papers focused on Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (46 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (19 papers) and Paleopathology and ancient diseases (12 papers). Mario Novak collaborates with scholars based in Croatia, United States and Ireland. Mario Novak's co-authors include Mario Šlaus, Ron Pinhasi, Kendra Sirak, Daniel Fernandes, Željka Bedić, Vyacheslav Moiseyev, Andrey Gromov, Guy Bar‐Oz, Fokke Gerritsen and Sarah Connell and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
In The Last Decade
Mario Novak
61 papers
receiving
679 citations
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Mario Novak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mario Novak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mario Novak more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mario Novak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mario Novak. The network helps show where Mario Novak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mario Novak
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mario Novak.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mario Novak based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mario Novak. Mario Novak is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Novak, Mario. (2016). Sex Assessment Using the Femur and Tibia in Medieval Skeletal Remains from Ireland: Discriminant Function Analysis.. PubMed. 40(1). 17–22.5 indexed citations
6.
Novak, Mario, et al.. (2013). Slučaj koštane tuberkuloze s nalazišta Sv. Ivan Krstitelj u Ivankovu kraj Vinkovaca. Hrčak Portal of scientific journals of Croatia (University Computing Centre). 30(1). 93–106.1 indexed citations
7.
Bedić, Željka, Mario Novak, & Mario Šlaus. (2013). Anthropological analysis of the human skeletal remains from the late antique necropolis (4th century AD) of Tekić-Treštanovačka gradina near Požega. 17. 301–320.4 indexed citations
8.
Novak, Mario. (2011). Bioarchaeological Analysis of the Human Skeletal Remains from the Late Mediaeval Cemetery of Koprivno, Southern Croatia. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.7 indexed citations
9.
Novak, Mario & Mario Šlaus. (2010). Health and disease in a Roman walled city: an example of Colonia Iulia Iader.. PubMed. 88. 189–206.13 indexed citations
10.
Novak, Mario, et al.. (2010). Subadultni stres u srednjovjekovnim i novovjekovnim populacijama kontinentalne Hrvatske. University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE). 26(1). 247–270.
11.
Novak, Mario, et al.. (2010). Subadult Stress in the Medieval and Early Modern Populations of Continental Croatia. 26(1). 247–270.2 indexed citations
12.
Novak, Mario, et al.. (2008). Antropološka analiza groblja Konjsko polje – Livade u kontekstu drugih ranosrednjovjekovnih grobalja iz Dalmacije. University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE). 211–238.
13.
Šlaus, Mario, et al.. (2007). Anthropological analysis of the cemetery from St Francis' church in Opatovina Zagreb. 15. 211–247.1 indexed citations
14.
Novak, Mario & Mario Šlaus. (2007). Frequency and Distribution of Cribra Orbita/ia in the Late Medieval Population of Dugopolje. 34(34). 451–475.3 indexed citations
15.
Novak, Mario & Mario Šlaus. (2007). UČESTALOSTI DISTRIBUCIJA CRIBRAE ORBITALlAE U KASNOSREDNJOVJEKOVNOJ POPULACIJI IZ DUGOPOLJA. University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE). 451–475.6 indexed citations
16.
Šlaus, Mario, et al.. (2007). Antropološka analiza kasnosrednjovjekovnog groblja kraj crkve Sv. Franje na Opatovini u Zagrebu. 15. 211–247.1 indexed citations
17.
Novak, Mario, et al.. (2007). Bioarchaeological characteristics of the Early Modern population from the Koprivno - Kod križa site near Klis. 31(1). 303–346.7 indexed citations
18.
Šlaus, Mario & Mario Novak. (2007). A Case of Venereal Syphilis in the Modern Age Horizon of Graves near the Church of St. Lawrence in Crkvari. 24(1). 503–510.4 indexed citations
19.
Šlaus, Mario & Mario Novak. (2006). An analysis of traumas in medieval samples from Kliškovac and Crkvari. 23(1). 213–228.5 indexed citations
20.
Šlaus, Mario & Mario Novak. (2006). Analiza trauma u srednjovjekovnim uzorcima iz Kliškovca i Crkvara. University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE). 23(1). 213–228.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.