Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Towards a Theory of Longitudinal Trust Calibration in Human–Robot Teams
2019247 citationsEwart J. de Visser, Marieke Peeters et al.International Journal of Social Roboticsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Marieke Peeters
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Marieke Peeters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marieke Peeters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marieke Peeters more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marieke Peeters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marieke Peeters. The network helps show where Marieke Peeters may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marieke Peeters
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marieke Peeters.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marieke Peeters based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Marieke Peeters. Marieke Peeters is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Visser, Ewart J. de, Marieke Peeters, Malte Jung, et al.. (2019). Towards a Theory of Longitudinal Trust Calibration in Human–Robot Teams. International Journal of Social Robotics. 12(2). 459–478.247 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Huizing, Ard, et al.. (2019). Governing ethical and effective behaviour of intelligent systems: A novel framework for meaningful human control in a military context. TNO Repository. 188(6). 302.2 indexed citations
Peeters, Marieke, et al.. (2016). Human-agent experience sharing : Creating social agents for elderly people with dementia. TNO Repository.2 indexed citations
Harbers, Maaike, et al.. (2015). Perceived Autonomy of Robots: Effects of Appearance and Context. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).1 indexed citations
Peeters, Marieke, et al.. (2012). Situated cognitive engineering : the requirements and design of automatically directed scenario-based training. Repository hosted by TU Delft Library (TU Delft). 266–272.4 indexed citations
17.
Peeters, Marieke, et al.. (2012). An ontology for integrating didactics into a serious training game. TNO Repository. 898. 1.2 indexed citations
18.
Peeters, Marieke, et al.. (2011). Situated cognitive engineering : the requirements and design of directed scenario-based training. TNO Repository. 1.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.