Marie Henderson
Impact in
-
- Finite Group Theory Research
- Sensory Systems top 10%
- Ion Channels and Receptors
Papers in
-
- Coding theory and cryptography 9
-
- Finite Group Theory Research 5
- Co-authors
- Robert S. Coulter (10 shared papers)Linda M. Bartoshuk (1 shared paper)Valerie B. Duffy (1 shared paper)Dennis Cooper (1 shared paper)Ann M. Berger (1 shared paper)Lloyd Saberski (1 shared paper)Malavika Prabhu (1 shared paper)Kaitlyn James (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Finite Fields and Their Applications (2 papers)Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (1 paper)Discrete Mathematics (1 paper)Obstetrics and Gynecology (1 paper)Advances in Mathematics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Marie Henderson
12 papers receiving 255 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 62
- Sensory Systems 30
- Otorhinolaryngology 19
- Artificial Intelligence 135
- Geometry and Topology 25
Countries citing papers authored by Marie Henderson
This map shows the geographic impact of Marie Henderson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marie Henderson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marie Henderson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marie Henderson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marie Henderson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marie Henderson. The network helps show where Marie Henderson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Marie Henderson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 88 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 56 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 42 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 15 | |
| 7 | 1999 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 5 | |
| 11 | Dickson polynomials of the second kind which are permutation polynomials over a finite field | 1998 | 4 |
| 12 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 0 |
About Marie Henderson
Marie Henderson is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Geometry and Topology, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 13 papers that have together received 272 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coding theory and cryptography (9 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (5 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (3 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (2 papers), Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic (2 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (2 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (2 papers) and Rings, Modules, and Algebras (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (62 citations), Sensory Systems (30 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (19 citations), Artificial Intelligence (135 citations) and Geometry and Topology (25 citations). Marie Henderson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Robert S. Coulter, Linda M. Bartoshuk, Valerie B. Duffy, Dennis Cooper, Ann M. Berger, Lloyd Saberski, Malavika Prabhu, Kaitlyn James, Lisa Leffert and Brian T. Bateman. Their work appears in journals such as Finite Fields and Their Applications, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Discrete Mathematics, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Advances in Mathematics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.