María‐José Endara
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 15
-
- Plant and animal studies 20
- Plant Diversity and Evolution 4
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 3
- Insect Science top 5%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Plant Parasitism and Resistance 7
-
- Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis 4
- Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions 2
-
- Tree-ring climate responses 1
- Co-authors
- Phyllis D. ColeyThomas A. KursarDale L. ForristerJames A. NichollsGordon C. YounkinR. Toby PenningtonKyle G. DexterGraham N. Stone
- Cited by
- Nature and Landscape ConservationEcology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsEcological Modeling
- Journals
- Science (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Scientific Reports (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesEcuadorPanama
In The Last Decade
María‐José Endara
22 papers receiving 970 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 516
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 609
- Ecological Modeling 95
- Insect Science 168
- Plant Science 359
Countries citing papers authored by María‐José Endara
This map shows the geographic impact of María‐José Endara's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by María‐José Endara with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites María‐José Endara more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by María‐José Endara
This network shows the impact of papers produced by María‐José Endara. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by María‐José Endara. The network helps show where María‐José Endara may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside María‐José Endara, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 6 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 26 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 25 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 81 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 44 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 102 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 44 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 35 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 62 |
About María‐José Endara
María‐José Endara is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecological Modeling, having authored 24 papers that have together received 991 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (20 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (15 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (7 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (4 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (4 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (2 papers) and Tree-ring climate responses (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (516 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (609 citations) and Ecological Modeling (95 citations). María‐José Endara has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ecuador and Panama. Frequent co-authors include Phyllis D. Coley, Phyllis D. Coley, Thomas A. Kursar, Dale L. Forrister, James A. Nicholls, Gordon C. Younkin, R. Toby Pennington, Kyle G. Dexter, Graham N. Stone and Natasha Wiggins. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.