María‐Inés López‐Ibor
-
- Aesthetic Perception and Analysis 1
- Neural dynamics and brain function 1
- Face Recognition and Perception 1
-
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies 2
-
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments 2
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 2
-
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders 2
-
- Mental Health and Psychiatry 5
- Co-authors
- Juan J López-IborTomás OrtizAlberto FernándezRoberto HorneroCarlos GómezAgustı́n TurreroMaría Andreina MéndezJuan A. Barcia
- Journals
- Journal of Affective Disorders (1 paper)Clinical Neurophysiology (1 paper)Schizophrenia Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited States
In The Last Decade
María‐Inés López‐Ibor
9 papers receiving 124 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Cognitive Neuroscience 74
- Neurology 21
- Psychiatry and Mental health 24
- Clinical Psychology 29
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 15
Countries citing papers authored by María‐Inés López‐Ibor
This map shows the geographic impact of María‐Inés López‐Ibor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by María‐Inés López‐Ibor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites María‐Inés López‐Ibor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by María‐Inés López‐Ibor
This network shows the impact of papers produced by María‐Inés López‐Ibor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by María‐Inés López‐Ibor. The network helps show where María‐Inés López‐Ibor may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 10 scholars most cited alongside María‐Inés López‐Ibor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Paving the way for new research strategies in mental disorders. First part: the recurring crisis of psychiatry. | 2014 | 5 |
| 2 | Paving the way for new research strategies in mental disorders. Second part: the light at the end of the tunnel. | 2014 | 2 |
| 3 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 66 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 10 |
About María‐Inés López‐Ibor
María‐Inés López‐Ibor is a scholar working on Philosophy, Psychiatry and Mental health and Neurology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 133 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (1 paper), Neural dynamics and brain function (1 paper) and Face Recognition and Perception (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (74 citations), Neurology (21 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (24 citations). María‐Inés López‐Ibor has collaborated with scholars based in Spain and United States. Frequent co-authors include Juan J López-Ibor, Tomás Ortiz, Alberto Fernández, Roberto Hornero, Carlos Gómez, Agustı́n Turrero, María Andreina Méndez, Juan A. Barcia, Laura Ortiz-Terán and Marina Díaz‐Marsá. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Affective Disorders, Clinical Neurophysiology and Schizophrenia Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.