María‐Inés López‐Ibor

764 total citations
10 papers, 133 citations indexed

About

María‐Inés López‐Ibor is a scholar working on Philosophy, Psychiatry and Mental health and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, María‐Inés López‐Ibor has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 133 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Philosophy, 5 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 3 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in María‐Inés López‐Ibor's work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers). María‐Inés López‐Ibor is often cited by papers focused on Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers). María‐Inés López‐Ibor collaborates with scholars based in Spain and United States. María‐Inés López‐Ibor's co-authors include Juan J López-Ibor, Tomás Ortiz, Alberto Fernández, Roberto Hornero, Agustı́n Turrero, Carlos Gómez, María Andreina Méndez, Juan A. Barcia, Laura Ortiz-Terán and Marina Díaz‐Marsá and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Affective Disorders, Clinical Neurophysiology and Schizophrenia Research.

In The Last Decade

María‐Inés López‐Ibor

9 papers receiving 124 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
María‐Inés López‐Ibor Spain 6 74 29 24 21 19 10 133
Xenia Kobeleva Germany 10 122 1.6× 29 1.0× 71 3.0× 18 0.9× 3 0.2× 20 246
Marina Krylova Germany 8 115 1.6× 15 0.5× 14 0.6× 17 0.8× 7 0.4× 19 183
Inge Winter-van Rossum Netherlands 8 43 0.6× 26 0.9× 124 5.2× 9 0.4× 4 0.2× 16 210
Annamária Takáts Hungary 9 77 1.0× 23 0.8× 26 1.1× 14 0.7× 26 1.4× 27 309
Arabella Bouzigues France 6 39 0.5× 19 0.7× 47 2.0× 5 0.2× 4 0.2× 13 98
Nareg Berberian Canada 5 227 3.1× 12 0.4× 16 0.7× 4 0.2× 5 0.3× 13 270
Alexander R. D. Peattie United Kingdom 6 126 1.7× 22 0.8× 17 0.7× 4 0.2× 5 0.3× 10 178
Charlotte Fraza United Kingdom 5 113 1.5× 8 0.3× 33 1.4× 6 0.3× 7 0.4× 13 182
Eduardo A. Aponte Switzerland 10 204 2.8× 13 0.4× 39 1.6× 8 0.4× 3 0.2× 16 283
Alejandro de Marinis Chile 5 50 0.7× 13 0.4× 158 6.6× 17 0.8× 4 0.2× 8 185

Countries citing papers authored by María‐Inés López‐Ibor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of María‐Inés López‐Ibor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by María‐Inés López‐Ibor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites María‐Inés López‐Ibor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by María‐Inés López‐Ibor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by María‐Inés López‐Ibor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by María‐Inés López‐Ibor. The network helps show where María‐Inés López‐Ibor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of María‐Inés López‐Ibor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of María‐Inés López‐Ibor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of María‐Inés López‐Ibor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with María‐Inés López‐Ibor. María‐Inés López‐Ibor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
López-Ibor, Juan J & María‐Inés López‐Ibor. (2014). Paving the way for new research strategies in mental disorders. First part: the recurring crisis of psychiatry.. PubMed. 41(1). 33–43. 5 indexed citations
2.
López-Ibor, Juan J & María‐Inés López‐Ibor. (2014). Paving the way for new research strategies in mental disorders. Second part: the light at the end of the tunnel.. PubMed. 41(2). 67–75. 2 indexed citations
3.
Barcia, Juan A., et al.. (2013). Deep Brain Stimulation for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Is the Side Relevant?. Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery. 92(1). 31–36. 11 indexed citations
4.
Fernández, Alberto, María‐Inés López‐Ibor, Agustı́n Turrero, et al.. (2011). Lempel–Ziv complexity in schizophrenia: A MEG study. Clinical Neurophysiology. 122(11). 2227–2235. 66 indexed citations
5.
López-Ibor, Juan J & María‐Inés López‐Ibor. (2009). Anxiety and logos: Toward a linguistic analysis of the origins of human thinking. Journal of Affective Disorders. 120(1-3). 1–11. 5 indexed citations
6.
López-Ibor, Juan J, et al.. (2008). Transcranial magnetic stimulation. Current Opinion in Psychiatry. 21(6). 640–644. 22 indexed citations
7.
López-Ibor, Juan J & María‐Inés López‐Ibor. (2008). Anthropological Perspectives in Psychiatric Nosology. Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology. 15(3). 259–263. 2 indexed citations
8.
López-Ibor, Juan J & María‐Inés López‐Ibor. (2008). Creativity Belongs to the Person, not to Disease. Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology. 15(3). 277–279. 1 indexed citations
9.
López-Ibor, Juan J, María‐Inés López‐Ibor, Laura Ortiz-Terán, et al.. (2007). The perception of emotion-free faces in schizophrenia: A magneto-encephalography study. Schizophrenia Research. 98(1-3). 278–286. 9 indexed citations
10.
López-Ibor, Juan J & María‐Inés López‐Ibor. (2003). Research on obsessive-compulsive disorder. Current Opinion in Psychiatry. 16. S85–S91. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Xenia Kobeleva Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marina Krylova Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Inge Winter-van Rossum Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Annamária Takáts Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Arabella Bouzigues Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nareg Berberian Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alexander R. D. Peattie Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Charlotte Fraza Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Eduardo A. Aponte Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alejandro de Marinis
Rankless by CCL
2026