Maria T. Chao
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Complementary and alternative medicine top 0.5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Ana F. Abraído‐LanzaKaren R. FlórezChristine WadeFredi KronenbergDebra KalmussLinda F. CushmanLarissa G. DuncanMarilie D. Gammon
- Topics
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (28 papers)Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (12 papers)Pain Management and Placebo Effect (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaCanada
In The Last Decade
Maria T. Chao
63 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- General Health Professions 550
- Clinical Psychology 530
- Complementary and alternative medicine 518
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 459
- Sociology and Political Science 393
Countries citing papers authored by Maria T. Chao
This map shows the geographic impact of Maria T. Chao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maria T. Chao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maria T. Chao more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Maria T. Chao
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maria T. Chao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maria T. Chao. The network helps show where Maria T. Chao may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maria T. Chao
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maria T. Chao. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maria T. Chao based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maria T. Chao. Maria T. Chao is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 61 | |
| 20 | Religion, spirituality, and healthcare choices of African-American women: results of a national survey. | 95 |
About Maria T. Chao
Maria T. Chao is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Reproductive Medicine and Health Information Management, having authored 68 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (28 papers), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (12 papers) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (518 citations), Health (285 citations) and Clinical Psychology (530 citations). Maria T. Chao has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ana F. Abraído‐Lanza, Karen R. Flórez, Christine Wade, Fredi Kronenberg, Debra Kalmuss, Linda F. Cushman, Larissa G. Duncan, Marilie D. Gammon, Nancy Bardacke and Michael Cohn. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Journal of Public Health and Social Science & Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.