María Monroy

730 total citations · 1 hit paper
15 papers, 478 citations indexed

About

María Monroy is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, María Monroy has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 478 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 6 papers in Social Psychology and 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in María Monroy's work include Media Influence and Health (8 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (2 papers). María Monroy is often cited by papers focused on Media Influence and Health (8 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (2 papers). María Monroy collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and Spain. María Monroy's co-authors include Dacher Keltner, Craig L. Anderson, Dante D. Dixson, Yang Bai, Alan Cowen, Serena Chen, Verónica Benet‐Martínez, Shanmukh V. Kamble, Daniel T. Cordaro and Rui Sun and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Scientific Reports and Journal of Personality.

In The Last Decade

María Monroy

13 papers receiving 465 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Awe as a Pathway to Mental and Physical Health

2022 72 citations María Monroy, Dacher Keltner Perspectives on Psychological Science profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
María Monroy United States	10	210	180	138	102	75	15	478
Ziyan Yang China	11	67 0.3×	153 0.8×	109 0.8×	77 0.8×	99 1.3×	24	371
Christopher D. Rodeheffer United States	11	55 0.3×	200 1.1×	249 1.8×	196 1.9×	93 1.2×	14	575
Kirill Fayn Australia	11	106 0.5×	180 1.0×	89 0.6×	216 2.1×	69 0.9×	17	502
Rebecca N. H. de Leeuw Netherlands	16	118 0.6×	124 0.7×	144 1.0×	73 0.7×	192 2.6×	36	622
Kristina M. DeNeve United States	4	75 0.4×	268 1.5×	235 1.7×	53 0.5×	89 1.2×	4	460
Gunnhild Johnsen Hjetland Norway	14	43 0.2×	76 0.4×	359 2.6×	99 1.0×	105 1.4×	30	595
Georg Hosoya Germany	9	40 0.2×	151 0.8×	51 0.4×	164 1.6×	32 0.4×	15	408
Dongning Ren Netherlands	16	65 0.3×	620 3.4×	244 1.8×	109 1.1×	353 4.7×	42	811
Peter Hitchcock United States	12	72 0.3×	56 0.3×	59 0.4×	170 1.7×	113 1.5×	41	410
Philipp Süssenbach Germany	16	26 0.1×	180 1.0×	251 1.8×	51 0.5×	99 1.3×	32	588

Countries citing papers authored by María Monroy

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of María Monroy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by María Monroy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites María Monroy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by María Monroy

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by María Monroy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by María Monroy. The network helps show where María Monroy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of María Monroy

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of María Monroy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of María Monroy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with María Monroy. María Monroy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

15 of 15 papers shown

Monroy, María, et al.. (2025). Awe reduces depressive symptoms and improves well-being in a randomized-controlled clinical trial. Scientific Reports. 15(1). 16453–16453.

Monroy, María, et al.. (2025). The role of emotion recognition in empathy.. Emotion. 25(7). 1704–1715. 1 indexed citations

Monroy, María, et al.. (2023). The influences of daily experiences of awe on stress, somatic health, and well-being: a longitudinal study during COVID-19. Scientific Reports. 13(1). 9336–9336. 10 indexed citations

Monroy, María, Alan Cowen, & Dacher Keltner. (2022). Intersectionality in emotion signaling and recognition: The influence of gender, ethnicity, and social class.. Emotion. 22(8). 1980–1988. 18 indexed citations

Brooks, Jeffrey A., Panagiotis Tzirakis, Alice Baird, et al.. (2022). Deep learning reveals what vocal bursts express in different cultures. Nature Human Behaviour. 7(2). 240–250. 15 indexed citations

Zhang, Jia Wei, et al.. (2022). Awe, curiosity, and multicultural experience. Journal of Personality. 91(3). 667–682. 6 indexed citations

Monroy, María & Dacher Keltner. (2022). Awe as a Pathway to Mental and Physical Health. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 18(2). 309–320. 72 indexed citations breakdown →

Bai, Yang, Serena Chen, Verónica Benet‐Martínez, et al.. (2021). Awe, daily stress, and elevated life satisfaction.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 120(4). 837–860. 64 indexed citations

Monroy, María, et al.. (2021). The dynamics of coping, positive emotions, and well-being: Evidence from Latin American immigrant farmworkers and college students during a time of political strife.. Emotion. 21(8). 1599–1609. 2 indexed citations

10.

Zhang, Jia Wei, Ryan T. Howell, Wen Jia Chai, et al.. (2021). Awe is associated with creative personality, convergent creativity, and everyday creativity.. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts. 18(2). 209–221. 17 indexed citations

11.

Meza, Jocelyn I., María Monroy, Ruofan Ma, & Rodolfo Mendoza‐Denton. (2019). Stigma and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: negative perceptions and anger emotional reactions mediate the link between active symptoms and social distance. ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders. 11(4). 373–382. 9 indexed citations

12.

Cordaro, Daniel T., Rui Sun, Shanmukh V. Kamble, et al.. (2019). The recognition of 18 facial-bodily expressions across nine cultures.. Emotion. 20(7). 1292–1300. 40 indexed citations

13.

Anderson, Craig L., Dante D. Dixson, María Monroy, & Dacher Keltner. (2019). Are awe‐prone people more curious? The relationship between dispositional awe, curiosity, and academic outcomes. Journal of Personality. 88(4). 762–779. 62 indexed citations

14.

Anderson, Craig L., María Monroy, & Dacher Keltner. (2018). Awe in nature heals: Evidence from military veterans, at-risk youth, and college students.. Emotion. 18(8). 1195–1202. 136 indexed citations

15.

Anderson, Craig L., María Monroy, & Dacher Keltner. (2017). Emotion in the wilds of nature: The coherence and contagion of fear during threatening group-based outdoors experiences.. Emotion. 18(3). 355–368. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact