Maria Jalmbrant

1.4k total citations
15 papers, 801 citations indexed

About

Maria Jalmbrant is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Maria Jalmbrant has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 801 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Clinical Psychology, 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Maria Jalmbrant's work include Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (6 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (3 papers) and Pregnancy-related medical research (3 papers). Maria Jalmbrant is often cited by papers focused on Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (6 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (3 papers) and Pregnancy-related medical research (3 papers). Maria Jalmbrant collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and Netherlands. Maria Jalmbrant's co-authors include T. Bourne, D. Timmerman, N. Mitchell‐Jones, J. Farren, Ben Van Calster, Laure Wynants, Jan Y. Verbakel, Chantal Van Audenhove, Mike J.L. Peters and M. Al‐Memar and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Human Reproduction Update and Transplantation.

In The Last Decade

Maria Jalmbrant

15 papers receiving 769 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Maria Jalmbrant United Kingdom	11	378	249	173	167	159	15	801
Åsa Premberg Sweden	10	343 0.9×	156 0.6×	297 1.7×	177 1.1×	97 0.6×	19	621
Meaghan A. Leddy United States	13	277 0.7×	166 0.7×	306 1.8×	251 1.5×	101 0.6×	20	878
Pooja Mehta United States	15	374 1.0×	156 0.6×	261 1.5×	406 2.4×	209 1.3×	28	814
María Yolanda Makuch Brazil	20	428 1.1×	101 0.4×	249 1.4×	333 2.0×	285 1.8×	60	980
Serena FitzGerald Ireland	12	292 0.8×	182 0.7×	64 0.4×	99 0.6×	190 1.2×	29	645
Emre Yanıkkerem Türkiye	17	471 1.2×	187 0.8×	238 1.4×	228 1.4×	181 1.1×	73	918
Amina White United States	10	134 0.4×	62 0.2×	35 0.2×	69 0.4×	151 0.9×	15	396
Stephen Heartwell United States	15	862 2.3×	233 0.9×	275 1.6×	368 2.2×	263 1.7×	33	1.2k
Frances Doran Australia	16	327 0.9×	110 0.4×	219 1.3×	147 0.9×	121 0.8×	36	600
Zoë Darwin United Kingdom	17	492 1.3×	276 1.1×	281 1.6×	170 1.0×	158 1.0×	44	856

Countries citing papers authored by Maria Jalmbrant

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Maria Jalmbrant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maria Jalmbrant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maria Jalmbrant more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Maria Jalmbrant

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maria Jalmbrant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maria Jalmbrant. The network helps show where Maria Jalmbrant may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maria Jalmbrant

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maria Jalmbrant. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maria Jalmbrant based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maria Jalmbrant. Maria Jalmbrant is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

15 of 15 papers shown

Kasaven, Lorraine, et al.. (2023). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perinatal services and maternal mental health in the UK. BJPsych Open. 9(1). e13–e13. 9 indexed citations

Farren, J., Maria Jalmbrant, N. Mitchell‐Jones, et al.. (2022). Prognostic factors for post-traumatic stress, anxiety and depression in women after early pregnancy loss: a multi-centre prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 12(3). e054490–e054490. 13 indexed citations

Jones, Benjamin P., Timothy Bracewell‐Milnes, Lorraine Kasaven, et al.. (2021). Pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: motivations, concerns, and perceptions in a UK population. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 38(8). 1987–1996. 3 indexed citations

Jones, Benjamin P., Nicola Williams, Srdjan Saso, et al.. (2021). Uterine Transplantation Using Living Donation: A Cross-sectional Study Assessing Perceptions, Acceptability, and Suitability. Transplantation Direct. 7(3). e673–e673. 2 indexed citations

Farren, J., Maria Jalmbrant, N. Mitchell‐Jones, et al.. (2020). Differences in post‐traumatic stress, anxiety and depression following miscarriage or ectopic pregnancy between women and their partners: multicenter prospective cohort study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 57(1). 141–148. 35 indexed citations

Jones, Benjamin P., Lorraine Kasaven, Maria Jalmbrant, et al.. (2020). The novel use of fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) treatment subscale to assess treatment acceptability in social egg freezing. Human Fertility. 25(3). 447–455. 7 indexed citations

Jones, Benjamin P., Lorraine Kasaven, Srdjan Saso, et al.. (2020). Uterine Transplantation: Review of Livebirths and Reproductive Implications. Transplantation. 105(8). 1695–1707. 22 indexed citations

Farren, J., Maria Jalmbrant, N. Mitchell‐Jones, et al.. (2019). Posttraumatic stress, anxiety and depression following miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy: a multicenter, prospective, cohort study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 222(4). 367.e1–367.e22. 157 indexed citations

Jones, Benjamin P., Lorraine Kasaven, Ariadne L’Heveder, et al.. (2019). Perceptions, outcomes, and regret following social egg freezing in the UK; a cross‐sectional survey. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 99(3). 324–332. 55 indexed citations

10.

Järvholm, Stina, Ann Marie Warren, Maria Jalmbrant, et al.. (2018). Preoperative psychological evaluation of uterus transplant recipients, partners, and living donors: Suggested framework. American Journal of Transplantation. 18(11). 2641–2646. 26 indexed citations

11.

Farren, J., N. Mitchell‐Jones, Jan Y. Verbakel, et al.. (2018). The psychological impact of early pregnancy loss. Human Reproduction Update. 24(6). 731–749. 155 indexed citations

12.

Bourne, T., B. De Cock, Laure Wynants, et al.. (2017). Doctors’ perception of support and the processes involved in complaints investigations and how these relate to welfare and defensive practice: a cross-sectional survey of the UK physicians. BMJ Open. 7(11). e017856–e017856. 31 indexed citations

13.

Bourne, T., Joke Vanderhaegen, Laure Wynants, et al.. (2016). Doctors' experiences and their perception of the most stressful aspects of complaints processes in the UK: an analysis of qualitative survey data. BMJ Open. 6(7). e011711–e011711. 50 indexed citations

14.

Farren, J., Maria Jalmbrant, Lieveke Ameye, et al.. (2016). Post-traumatic stress, anxiety and depression following miscarriage or ectopic pregnancy: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 6(11). e011864–e011864. 121 indexed citations

15.

Bourne, T., Laure Wynants, Mike J.L. Peters, et al.. (2015). The impact of complaints procedures on the welfare, health and clinical practise of 7926 doctors in the UK: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open. 5(1). e006687–e006687. 115 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact