Countries citing papers authored by Maria A. Wimmer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Maria A. Wimmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maria A. Wimmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maria A. Wimmer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maria A. Wimmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maria A. Wimmer. The network helps show where Maria A. Wimmer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maria A. Wimmer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maria A. Wimmer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maria A. Wimmer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Maria A. Wimmer. Maria A. Wimmer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ronzhyn, Alexander & Maria A. Wimmer. (2019). Literature Review of Ethical Concerns in the Use of Disruptive Technologies in Government 3.0. 85–92.6 indexed citations
5.
Wimmer, Maria A., et al.. (2017). SCOOP4C: Reducing Administrative Burden for Citizens through Once-Only – Vision & Challenges.2 indexed citations
6.
Tambouris, Efthimios, Panos Panagiotopoulos, Maria A. Wimmer, et al.. (2016). Proceedings of the 8th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, ePart 2016. UNU Collections (United Nations University).1 indexed citations
7.
Schöll, H., Marijn Janssen, Bram Klievink, et al.. (2016). Proceedings of the 8th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2016. UNU Collections (United Nations University).4 indexed citations
8.
Wimmer, Maria A., et al.. (2013). Wissens- und Kollaborationsplattform im Brand- und Katastrophenschutz: Open-Source als kostengünstige Option?. GI-Jahrestagung. 1634–1648.
9.
Moreno‐Jiménez, José María, et al.. (2013). The Effectiveness of E-governance experiences in the Knowledge Society. 354–363.3 indexed citations
10.
Moreno‐Jiménez, José María, et al.. (2013). Evaluating the Efficacy of E-Participation Experiences.. 250–257.4 indexed citations
Schmidt, Daniel, et al.. (2010). ENSURING SUSTAINABLE OPERATION IN COMPLEX ENVIRONMENT: THE PEPPOL PROJECT AND ITS VCD SYSTEM. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 61.2 indexed citations
14.
Wimmer, Maria A., et al.. (2009). Modellierung von Prozessen für E-Partizipation in BPMN.. 1804–1813.1 indexed citations
Pucihar, Andreja, et al.. (2007). Gap Analysis Methodology for Identifying Future Ict Related eGovernment Research Topics – Case of “Ontology and Semantic Web” in the Context of eGovernment. Bled eConference. 27.2 indexed citations
17.
Böhlen, Michael H., Johann Gamper, Wolfgang Polasek, & Maria A. Wimmer. (2005). E-Government: Towards Electronic Democracy: International Conference, TCGOV 2005, Bolzano, Italy, March 2-4, 2005, Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer ... / Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence). Springer eBooks.4 indexed citations
18.
Wimmer, Maria A.. (2003). Knowledge management in electronic government : 4th IFIP International Working Conference, KMGov 2003, Rhodes, Greece, May 26-28, 2003 : proceedings. Springer eBooks.5 indexed citations
19.
Wimmer, Maria A., et al.. (2002). Sicherheitskonzepte für e-Government - Technische versus ganzheitliche Ansätze.. 26.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.