Margaret‐Ellen Pipe
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 1%
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Karen SalmonMichael E. LambJ. Clare WilsonYael OrbachGail S. GoodmanDeirdre A. BrownSusan GeeDavid La Rooy
- Topics
- Memory Processes and Influences (41 papers)Child and Animal Learning Development (30 papers)Deception detection and forensic psychology (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Margaret‐Ellen Pipe
67 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.5k
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 958
- Social Psychology 779
- Clinical Psychology 670
- Sociology and Political Science 251
Countries citing papers authored by Margaret‐Ellen Pipe
This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret‐Ellen Pipe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret‐Ellen Pipe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret‐Ellen Pipe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret‐Ellen Pipe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret‐Ellen Pipe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret‐Ellen Pipe. The network helps show where Margaret‐Ellen Pipe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret‐Ellen Pipe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret‐Ellen Pipe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret‐Ellen Pipe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret‐Ellen Pipe. Margaret‐Ellen Pipe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 82 | |
| 3 | 22 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 39 | |
| 6 | 25 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 30 | |
| 9 | 48 | |
| 10 | 31 | |
| 11 | 157 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 65 | |
| 15 | 73 | |
| 16 | 53 | |
| 17 | 51 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | 28 |
About Margaret‐Ellen Pipe
Margaret‐Ellen Pipe is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology, having authored 70 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory Processes and Influences (41 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (30 papers) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (958 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.5k citations) and Social Psychology (779 citations). Margaret‐Ellen Pipe has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Karen Salmon, Michael E. Lamb, J. Clare Wilson, Yael Orbach, Gail S. Goodman, Deirdre A. Brown, Susan Gee, David La Rooy, Janice Murray and Jodi A. Quas. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Journal of Applied Psychology and Child Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.