Margarete Müller
Impact in
- Physiology top 0.1%
- Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Papers in
-
- Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling 4
- Co-authors
- Dietrich van CalkerBernd HamprechtWolfgang SchmidtCarlos Barajas‐LópezBertha Prieto-GómezAlexander S. ClanachanAndreas WeiheUritza von Groll
In The Last Decade
Margarete Müller
13 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Physiology 1.0k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 743
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 147
- Neurology 113
- Molecular Biology 878
Countries citing papers authored by Margarete Müller
This map shows the geographic impact of Margarete Müller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margarete Müller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margarete Müller more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Margarete Müller
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margarete Müller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margarete Müller. The network helps show where Margarete Müller may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Margarete Müller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 20 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 15 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 25 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 206 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 11 | |
| 6 | Safety and tolerability of naproxen ophthalmic solution in comparison to placebo. | 1999 | 5 |
| 7 | 1997 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 33 | |
| 9 | 1980 | 130 | |
| 10 | 1980 | 16 | |
| 11 | ADENOSINE REGULATES VIA TWO DIFFERENT TYPES OF RECEPTORS, THE ACCUMULATION OF CYCLIC AMP IN CULTURED BRAIN CELLS Hit paper breakdown → | 1979 | 1141 |
| 12 | 1978 | 198 | |
| 13 | 1978 | 86 |
About Margarete Müller
Margarete Müller is a scholar working on Physiology, Biological Psychiatry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacology and Ophthalmology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (3 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (3 papers), Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects (3 papers), Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (2 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (2 papers) and Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (1.0k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (743 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (147 citations), Neurology (113 citations) and Molecular Biology (878 citations). Margarete Müller has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Denmark and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Dietrich van Calker, Bernd Hamprecht, Wolfgang Schmidt, Carlos Barajas‐López, Bertha Prieto-Gómez, Alexander S. Clanachan, Andreas Weihe, Uritza von Groll, Thomas Börner and G Pabst. Their work appears in journals such as Planta, Journal of Neurochemistry, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and Plant and Soil.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.