Margaret McRorie
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Artificial Intelligence
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Co-authors
- Ian SneddonGary McKeownJennifer HanrattyÉtienne de SevinElisabetta BevacquaCatherine PélachaudJulie‐Ann JordanLaurence Devillers
- Topics
- Emotions and Moral Behavior (3 papers)Personality Traits and Psychology (3 papers)Emotion and Mood Recognition (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Margaret McRorie
12 papers receiving 263 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 157
- Social Psychology 114
- Cognitive Neuroscience 82
- Artificial Intelligence 63
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 51
Countries citing papers authored by Margaret McRorie
This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret McRorie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret McRorie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret McRorie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret McRorie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret McRorie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret McRorie. The network helps show where Margaret McRorie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret McRorie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret McRorie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret McRorie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret McRorie. Margaret McRorie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Evaluation of four designed virtual agents personalities (formerly building and evaluating personality in virtual agents) | 15 |
| 2 | 23 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 40 | |
| 5 | 93 | |
| 6 | Data and Databases: The HUMAINE database. | 0 |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | Induction techniques developed to illuminate relationships between signs of emotion and their context, physical and social | 1 |
| 9 | Building credible agents: Behaviour influenced by personality and emotional traits, | 12 |
| 10 | Real life emotions in French and English TV video clips: an integrated annotation protocol combining continuous and discrete approaches | 36 |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 5 |
About Margaret McRorie
Margaret McRorie is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 13 papers that have together received 274 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emotions and Moral Behavior (3 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (3 papers) and Emotion and Mood Recognition (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (157 citations), Social Psychology (114 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (82 citations). Margaret McRorie has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Ian Sneddon, Gary McKeown, Jennifer Hanratty, Étienne de Sevin, Elisabetta Bevacqua, Catherine Pélachaud, Julie‐Ann Jordan, Laurence Devillers, Ellen Douglas‐Cowie and Roddy Cowie. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Personality and Individual Differences and Intelligence.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.