Margaret Gregory

1.0k total citations
24 papers, 795 citations indexed

About

Margaret Gregory is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Margaret Gregory has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 795 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 5 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 4 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Margaret Gregory's work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (3 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (2 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers). Margaret Gregory is often cited by papers focused on Neuroscience and Music Perception (3 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (2 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers). Margaret Gregory collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Malaysia and United States. Margaret Gregory's co-authors include D. Ε. Broadbent, Donald E. Broadbent, E. C. Poulton, H. C. A. Dale, Rea Reason, Barbara Brown, William J. McLaughlin and Jati Kasuma and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society and Ergonomics.

In The Last Decade

Margaret Gregory

22 papers receiving 645 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Margaret Gregory United Kingdom 14 455 267 179 145 64 24 795
D. W. J. Corcoran United Kingdom 11 225 0.5× 187 0.7× 118 0.7× 135 0.9× 33 0.5× 24 522
G. H. Mowbray United States 12 404 0.9× 275 1.0× 113 0.6× 101 0.7× 41 0.6× 27 647
Gary L. Dannenbring Canada 13 607 1.3× 215 0.8× 56 0.3× 245 1.7× 51 0.8× 16 734
Davis Howes United States 11 523 1.1× 285 1.1× 89 0.5× 335 2.3× 198 3.1× 16 1.1k
R. Davis United Kingdom 14 579 1.3× 361 1.4× 146 0.8× 116 0.8× 35 0.5× 20 886
Denny C. LeCompte United States 19 977 2.1× 506 1.9× 186 1.0× 255 1.8× 124 1.9× 31 1.2k
R. A. Kinchla United States 14 1.1k 2.3× 418 1.6× 228 1.3× 133 0.9× 64 1.0× 20 1.3k
James M. Vanderplas United States 9 371 0.8× 175 0.7× 117 0.7× 128 0.9× 40 0.6× 26 683
J. Scott Kelso United States 7 492 1.1× 210 0.8× 152 0.8× 207 1.4× 81 1.3× 8 741
Jennifer A. Stillman New Zealand 18 286 0.6× 204 0.8× 94 0.5× 114 0.8× 19 0.3× 35 882

Countries citing papers authored by Margaret Gregory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret Gregory's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret Gregory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret Gregory more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret Gregory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret Gregory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret Gregory. The network helps show where Margaret Gregory may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret Gregory

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret Gregory. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret Gregory based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret Gregory. Margaret Gregory is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kasuma, Jati, et al.. (2023). Intention to Use E-Commerce Payment: Empirical Evidence Among Consumers in Sarawak. ˜The œEuropean Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences. 132. 634–643. 1 indexed citations
2.
Gregory, Margaret, et al.. (2023). The Effect of Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Risk and Reward Towards E-wallet Usage Intention: A Moderating Role of Trust. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 13(9). 2 indexed citations
3.
Kasuma, Jati, et al.. (2023). Engagement of Sarawak’s Gen Y Bidayuh Farmers in Agropreneurship. ˜The œEuropean Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences. 132. 621–633. 1 indexed citations
4.
Gregory, Margaret, et al.. (2005). A Portrait of Balance: Personal and Professional Balance among Student Affairs Educators.. College student affairs journal. 24(2). 110–127. 11 indexed citations
5.
Gregory, Margaret, et al.. (2003). Valuing Health for All: PCTs and the Health of People with Learning Disabilities. Journal of Integrated Care. 11(3). 26–33. 1 indexed citations
6.
Reason, Rea, et al.. (1988). Does the ‘specific’ in specific learning difficulties make a difference to the way we teach?. Support for Learning. 3(4). 230–236. 6 indexed citations
7.
Gregory, Margaret & E. C. Poulton. (1970). Even versus Uneven Right-hand Margins and the Rate of Comprehension in Reading. Ergonomics. 13(4). 427–434. 38 indexed citations
8.
Broadbent, D. Ε. & Margaret Gregory. (1968). Visual perception of words differing in letter digram frequency. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 7(2). 569–571. 37 indexed citations
9.
Broadbent, Donald E. & Margaret Gregory. (1967). Psychological refractory period and the length of time required to make a decision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences. 168(1011). 181–193. 44 indexed citations
10.
Broadbent, D. Ε. & Margaret Gregory. (1967). Perception of Emotionally Toned Words. Nature. 215(5101). 581–584. 34 indexed citations
11.
Dale, H. C. A. & Margaret Gregory. (1966). Evidence of semantic coding in short-term memory. Psychonomic Science. 5(2). 75–76. 29 indexed citations
12.
Dale, H. C. A. & Margaret Gregory. (1966). Evidence of semantic coding in short-term memory. Psychonomic Science. 5(4). 153–154. 3 indexed citations
13.
Broadbent, Donald E. & Margaret Gregory. (1965). Effects of Noise and of Signal Rate upon Vigilance Analysed by Means of Decision Theory. Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 7(2). 155–162. 86 indexed citations
14.
Broadbent, D. Ε. & Margaret Gregory. (1964). Stimulus Set and Response Set: The Alternation of Attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 16(4). 309–317. 60 indexed citations
15.
Broadbent, D. Ε. & Margaret Gregory. (1964). Accuracy of Recognition for Speech Presented to the Right and Left Ears. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 16(4). 359–360. 66 indexed citations
16.
Broadbent, Donald E. & Margaret Gregory. (1963). Division of attention and the decision theory of signal detection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences. 158(971). 222–231. 68 indexed citations
17.
Broadbent, D. Ε. & Margaret Gregory. (1963). VIGILANCE CONSIDERED AS A STATISTICAL DECISION. British Journal of Psychology. 54(4). 309–323. 118 indexed citations
18.
Broadbent, D. Ε. & Margaret Gregory. (1962). Human Response to Classes of Stimuli. Nature. 193(4822). 1315–1316. 8 indexed citations
19.
Broadbent, D. Ε. & Margaret Gregory. (1961). Shorter Articles and Notes: On the Recall of Stimuli Presented Alternately to two Sense-Organs. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 13(2). 103–109. 44 indexed citations
20.
Gregory, Margaret & William J. McLaughlin. (1951). Teaching the Newspaper in Junior High Schools. The English Journal. 40(1). 23–23. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026