Margaret Gilmore
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Philosophy top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Harold W. KoenigsbergArnold M. CooperRichard D. KaplanAllen FrancesJohn F. ClarkinStephen W. HurtThomas A. WidigerMarie G. Rudden
- Topics
- Aging and Gerontology Research (2 papers)Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (2 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of PsychiatryJournal of Abnormal PsychologyInternational Journal of Nursing Studies
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Margaret Gilmore
14 papers receiving 426 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Clinical Psychology 381
- Psychiatry and Mental health 157
- Philosophy 124
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 66
- Social Psychology 32
Countries citing papers authored by Margaret Gilmore
This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret Gilmore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret Gilmore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret Gilmore more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret Gilmore
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret Gilmore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret Gilmore. The network helps show where Margaret Gilmore may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret Gilmore
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret Gilmore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret Gilmore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret Gilmore. Margaret Gilmore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 201 | |
| 5 | 37 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 154 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | The nurse/graduate in nursing: preliminary findings of a follow-up study of former students of the University of Edinburgh degree/nursing programme. | 4 |
| 15 | 1 |
About Margaret Gilmore
Margaret Gilmore is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Research and Theory and Clinical Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 470 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aging and Gerontology Research (2 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (2 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (381 citations), Philosophy (124 citations) and Research and Theory (10 citations). Margaret Gilmore has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Harold W. Koenigsberg, Arnold M. Cooper, Richard D. Kaplan, Allen Frances, John F. Clarkin, Stephen W. Hurt, Thomas A. Widiger, Marie G. Rudden, John A. Sweeney and Alison J. Tierney. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Abnormal Psychology and International Journal of Nursing Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.