Margaret Dell’Olio
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.5%
- Philosophy top 0.2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Patrick D. McGorryLisa PhillipsAlison R. YungElizabeth CosgraveHok Pan YuenDaniel P. KellyShona M. FranceyEóin Killackey
- Topics
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (3 papers)Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaSwitzerlandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Margaret Dell’Olio
5 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.7k
- Philosophy 730
- Clinical Psychology 595
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 444
- Cognitive Neuroscience 369
Countries citing papers authored by Margaret Dell’Olio
This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret Dell’Olio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret Dell’Olio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret Dell’Olio more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret Dell’Olio
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret Dell’Olio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret Dell’Olio. The network helps show where Margaret Dell’Olio may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret Dell’Olio
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret Dell’Olio. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret Dell’Olio based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret Dell’Olio. Margaret Dell’Olio is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | Effects of low dose lithium on hippocampal neuropathology in people at ultra-high risk for psychosis | 5 |
| 3 | 44 | |
| 4 | Mapping the Onset of Psychosis: The Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental Statesbreakdown → | 1629 |
| 5 | 311 |
About Margaret Dell’Olio
Margaret Dell’Olio is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (1.7k citations), Biological Psychiatry (210 citations) and Philosophy (730 citations). Margaret Dell’Olio has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Patrick D. McGorry, Lisa Phillips, Alison R. Yung, Elizabeth Cosgrave, Hok Pan Yuen, Daniel P. Kelly, Shona M. Francey, Eóin Killackey, Carrie Stanford and Katherine Godfrey. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Schizophrenia Research and Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.