Margaret Bird
About
In The Last Decade
Margaret Bird
8 papers receiving 299 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Rheumatology 156
- Speech and Hearing 101
- Urology 92
- Surgery 88
- Epidemiology 81
Countries citing papers authored by Margaret Bird
This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret Bird's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret Bird with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret Bird more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret Bird
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret Bird. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret Bird. The network helps show where Margaret Bird may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret Bird
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret Bird. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret Bird based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret Bird. Margaret Bird is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Use of point of care outcomes data facilitates quality improvement in palliative care | 5 |
| 2 | 83 | |
| 3 | 85 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 118 | |
| 8 | 14 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.