Marga Esbert

805 total citations
30 papers, 519 citations indexed

About

Marga Esbert is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Marga Esbert has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 519 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 20 papers in Reproductive Medicine and 13 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Marga Esbert's work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (24 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (11 papers) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (11 papers). Marga Esbert is often cited by papers focused on Reproductive Biology and Fertility (24 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (11 papers) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (11 papers). Marga Esbert collaborates with scholars based in Spain, United States and United Kingdom. Marga Esbert's co-authors include Jesús Aguilar, Alison Campbell, H. Nadir Çıray, Sandrine Chamayou, Inge Agerholm, Shabana Sayed, M. Florensa, Marcos Meseguer, Alberto Pacheco and A. Ballesteros and has published in prestigious journals such as Endocrinology, Human Reproduction and Fertility and Sterility.

In The Last Decade

Marga Esbert

27 papers receiving 502 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Marga Esbert Spain 8 434 324 222 134 22 30 519
Marı́a José Escribá Spain 7 365 0.8× 195 0.6× 188 0.8× 197 1.5× 19 0.9× 15 451
Ahmet Zeki Işık Türkiye 16 397 0.9× 443 1.4× 243 1.1× 81 0.6× 43 2.0× 33 628
Luis Guzmán Belgium 11 480 1.1× 436 1.3× 186 0.8× 100 0.7× 41 1.9× 23 574
Guoning Huang China 11 196 0.5× 159 0.5× 126 0.6× 92 0.7× 15 0.7× 36 312
S.K. Shipley United States 7 257 0.6× 177 0.5× 186 0.8× 59 0.4× 23 1.0× 15 348
Kolbe Hancock United States 7 193 0.4× 184 0.6× 135 0.6× 43 0.3× 29 1.3× 10 294
Janni Vikkelsø Jeppesen Denmark 14 608 1.4× 550 1.7× 140 0.6× 198 1.5× 55 2.5× 21 742
Vijay Mangoli India 11 311 0.7× 370 1.1× 68 0.3× 134 1.0× 37 1.7× 17 485
Sadhana Desai India 12 320 0.7× 392 1.2× 78 0.4× 136 1.0× 42 1.9× 23 528
Thelma M. Macaso United States 12 258 0.6× 281 0.9× 153 0.7× 61 0.5× 66 3.0× 24 434

Countries citing papers authored by Marga Esbert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marga Esbert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marga Esbert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marga Esbert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marga Esbert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marga Esbert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marga Esbert. The network helps show where Marga Esbert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marga Esbert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marga Esbert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marga Esbert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marga Esbert. Marga Esbert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Coticchio, Giovanni, Danilo Cimadomo, Michel De Vos, et al.. (2025). To rescue or not to rescue immature oocytes: prospects and challenges. Fertility and Sterility. 123(5). 749–758. 1 indexed citations
2.
Florensa, M., et al.. (2025). Fertility treatments in transgender individuals: trends, clinical outcomes, and impact of testosterone on ovarian stimulation. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 42(9). 3021–3030.
3.
Esbert, Marga, et al.. (2025). Oocyte maturation defect in women undergoing IVF: contributing factors and effects on mature sibling oocyte outcomes. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 42(3). 773–780.
4.
Florensa, M., et al.. (2024). Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: predictive embryonic factors. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 41(5). 1329–1339. 1 indexed citations
6.
Florensa, M., et al.. (2023). FERTILITY TREATMENTS AMONG THE TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY: DEMOGRAPHICS, TYPE OF TREATMENTS AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES. Fertility and Sterility. 120(4). e159–e159.
8.
Esbert, Marga, Cristina Arguedas García, Nicolás Garrido, et al.. (2023). Oocyte rescue in-vitro maturation does not adversely affect chromosome segregation during the first meiotic division. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 48(1). 103379–103379. 5 indexed citations
9.
Kubikova, Nada, Marga Esbert, Shiny Titus, et al.. (2023). O-075 Deficiency of DNA double-strand break repair in human preimplantation embryos revealed by CRISPR-Cas9. Human Reproduction. 38(Supplement_1). 1 indexed citations
10.
Esbert, Marga, et al.. (2022). Calcium Ionophore A23187 treatment to rescue unfertilized oocytes: a prospective randomized analysis of sibling oocytes. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 45(5). 878–883. 8 indexed citations
11.
Esbert, Marga, et al.. (2021). CAN CALCIUM IONOPHORE A23187 RESCUE UNFERTILIZED OOCYTES?. Fertility and Sterility. 116(3). e337–e337. 1 indexed citations
12.
Esbert, Marga, Xin Tao, Li Ma, et al.. (2021). ADDITION OF RAPAMYCIN AND YOUNG GRANULOSA CELLS TO IMPROVE IN VITRO OOCYTE MATURATION AND EUPLOIDY RATES IN OLDER REPRODUCTIVE AGE WOMEN: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY. Fertility and Sterility. 116(3). e167–e168. 1 indexed citations
13.
Sciorio, Romualdo, et al.. (2020). Blastocyst collapse as an embryo marker of low implantation potential: a time-lapse multicentre study. Zygote. 28(2). 139–147. 31 indexed citations
14.
Rienzi, Laura, Danilo Cimadomo, Maria Giulia Minasi, et al.. (2019). Time of morulation and trophectoderm quality are predictors of a live birth after euploid blastocyst transfer: a multicenter study. Fertility and Sterility. 112(6). 1080–1093.e1. 46 indexed citations
15.
Esbert, Marga, et al.. (2019). Efectos del estilo de vida y determinados compuestos tóxicos sobre la fertilidad masculina. 6(2-3). 47–62. 1 indexed citations
16.
Esbert, Marga, et al.. (2017). Does the blastocyst collapse respond to a biological need? The analysis of 1,952 embryos by time-lapse can give an answer. Fertility and Sterility. 108(3). e157–e157. 2 indexed citations
17.
Çıray, H. Nadir, Alison Campbell, Inge Agerholm, et al.. (2014). Proposed guidelines on the nomenclature and annotation of dynamic human embryo monitoring by a time-lapse user group. Human Reproduction. 29(12). 2650–2660. 205 indexed citations
18.
Florensa, M., et al.. (2014). Frequency and impact on embryo development of reverse cleavage in human embryos. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 28. S14–S14. 2 indexed citations
19.
Esbert, Marga, et al.. (2013). Effect of oocyte denudation timing on clinical outcomes in 1212 oocyte recipients. Fertility and Sterility. 100(3). S482–S482. 2 indexed citations
20.
Esbert, Marga, Alberto Pacheco, Francesca Vidal, et al.. (2011). Impact of sperm DNA fragmentation on the outcome of IVF with own or donated oocytes. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 23(6). 704–710. 67 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026