Marco Pitino
- Plant Science top 2%
- Insect Science top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology
- Horticulture top 1%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Saskia A. HogenhoutMassimo E. MaffeiYongping DuanChristopher J. RidoutJorunn I. B. BosAlexander D. ColemanDavid PrinceJoe Win
- Topics
- Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens (13 papers)Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (9 papers)Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (9 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEThe Plant Cell
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomItaly
In The Last Decade
Marco Pitino
22 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Plant Science 1.1k
- Insect Science 831
- Molecular Biology 457
- Horticulture 105
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 98
Countries citing papers authored by Marco Pitino
This map shows the geographic impact of Marco Pitino's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marco Pitino with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marco Pitino more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marco Pitino
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marco Pitino. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marco Pitino. The network helps show where Marco Pitino may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marco Pitino
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marco Pitino. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marco Pitino based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marco Pitino. Marco Pitino is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | 53 | |
| 12 | 48 | |
| 13 | 86 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 28 | |
| 18 | 161 | |
| 19 | 309 | |
| 20 | A Functional Genomics Approach Identifies Candidate Effectors from the Aphid Species Myzus persicae (Green Peach Aphid)breakdown → | 371 |
About Marco Pitino
Marco Pitino is a scholar working on Horticulture, Insect Science and Plant Science, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens (13 papers), Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (9 papers) and Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (105 citations), Insect Science (831 citations) and Plant Science (1.1k citations). Marco Pitino has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Saskia A. Hogenhout, Massimo E. Maffei, Yongping Duan, Christopher J. Ridout, Jorunn I. B. Bos, Alexander D. Coleman, David Prince, Joe Win, Cheryl M. Armstrong and Liliana M. Cano. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and The Plant Cell.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.