This map shows the geographic impact of Marc van Zee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marc van Zee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marc van Zee more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marc van Zee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marc van Zee. The network helps show where Marc van Zee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marc van Zee
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marc van Zee.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marc van Zee based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Marc van Zee. Marc van Zee is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Zee, Marc van, Dragan Doder, Leendert van der Torre, et al.. (2020). Intention as commitment toward time. Artificial Intelligence. 283. 103270–103270.2 indexed citations
Zee, Marc van, Dragan Doder, Mehdi Dastani, & Leendert van der Torre. (2015). AGM revision of beliefs about action and time. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg). 3250–3256.5 indexed citations
5.
Linden, Dirk van der & Marc van Zee. (2015). Insights from a Study on Decision Making in Enterprise Architecture. 1497. 21–30.4 indexed citations
6.
Zee, Marc van, Mehdi Dastani, Dragan Doder, & Leendert van der Torre. (2015). Consistency Conditions for Beliefs and Intentions. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg).3 indexed citations
7.
Zee, Marc van & Thomas Icard. (2015). Intention Reconsideration as Metareasoning. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg).
8.
Zee, Marc van. (2015). Rational architecture = architecture from a recommender perspective. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg). 4403–4404.2 indexed citations
Zee, Marc van & Dirk van der Linden. (2015). ARMED: ARgumentation Mining and reasoning about Enterprise architecture Decisions. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg).
11.
Torre, Leendert van der, et al.. (2014). Reasoning on Robot Knowledge from Discrete and Asynchronous Observations. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg).
12.
Zee, Marc van, Patrick Doherty, & John‐Jules Ch. Meyer. (2014). Encoding Definitional Fragments of Temporal Action Logic into Logic Programming. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg).
Zee, Marc van, Mehdi Dastani, Yoav Shoham, & Leendert van der Torre. (2014). Collective Intention Revision from a Database Perspective. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg).1 indexed citations
Zee, Marc van & Sepideh Ghanavati. (2014). Capturing Evidence and Rationales with Requirements Engineering and Argumentation-Based Techniques. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg).5 indexed citations
17.
Gabbay, Dov M., et al.. (2013). Argument Revival in Annotated Argumentation Networks. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg).
18.
Alechina, Natasha, Mehdi Dastani, Koen V. Hindriks, et al.. (2013). Multi-Cycle Query Caching in Agent Programming. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 27(1). 32–38.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.