Mao‐Meng Tiao
- Surgery top 2%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 1%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Li‐Tung HuangYou‐Lin TainJiunn‐Ming SheenHong‐Ren YuHsin‐Wei KuoJiin‐Haur ChuangChun‐Yuh YangChih‐Cheng Chen
- Topics
- Birth, Development, and Health (32 papers)Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (23 papers)Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (16 papers)
- Cited by
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child HealthObstetrics and GynecologyGeriatrics and Gerontology
- Journals
- PLoS ONEHepatologyPEDIATRICS
- Partner nations
- TaiwanUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Mao‐Meng Tiao
143 papers receiving 4.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
- Surgery 1.2k
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 892
- Molecular Biology 867
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 767
- Epidemiology 604
Countries citing papers authored by Mao‐Meng Tiao
This map shows the geographic impact of Mao‐Meng Tiao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mao‐Meng Tiao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mao‐Meng Tiao more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mao‐Meng Tiao
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mao‐Meng Tiao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mao‐Meng Tiao. The network helps show where Mao‐Meng Tiao may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mao‐Meng Tiao
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mao‐Meng Tiao. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mao‐Meng Tiao based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mao‐Meng Tiao. Mao‐Meng Tiao is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 30 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 28 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 82 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 61 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Mao‐Meng Tiao
Mao‐Meng Tiao is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Hepatology and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 148 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Birth, Development, and Health (32 papers), Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (23 papers) and Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (892 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (333 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (150 citations). Mao‐Meng Tiao has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Li‐Tung Huang, You‐Lin Tain, Jiunn‐Ming Sheen, Hong‐Ren Yu, Hsin‐Wei Kuo, Jiin‐Haur Chuang, Chun‐Yuh Yang, Chih‐Cheng Chen, Tsu‐Kung Lin and Pei‐Wen Wang. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Hepatology and PEDIATRICS.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.