Manuela Kanat
Impact in
- Pharmacy top 5%
- Infant Health and Development
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Papers in
-
- Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior 4
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics 1
-
- Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior 4
- Co-authors
- Markus Heinrichs (4 shared papers)Gregor Domes (4 shared papers)Ludger Tebartz van Elst (2 shared papers)Ralf Schwarzwald (1 shared paper)Irina Mader (1 shared paper)Andreas Riedel (1 shared paper)Helge Müller (2 shared papers)Swantje Matthies (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Neuropsychopharmacology (2 papers)BMC Geriatrics (1 paper)Brain Research (1 paper)BMJ Open (1 paper)Age and Ageing (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Germany
In The Last Decade
Manuela Kanat
10 papers receiving 314 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Pharmacy 54
- Social Psychology 202
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 115
- Behavioral Neuroscience 24
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 29
Countries citing papers authored by Manuela Kanat
This map shows the geographic impact of Manuela Kanat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Manuela Kanat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Manuela Kanat more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Manuela Kanat
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Manuela Kanat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Manuela Kanat. The network helps show where Manuela Kanat may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Manuela Kanat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 76 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 65 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 55 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 49 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 46 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 1 |
About Manuela Kanat
Manuela Kanat is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Epidemiology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 10 papers that have together received 322 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (4 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (4 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (2 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (2 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (1 paper), Infant Health and Development (1 paper) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (54 citations), Social Psychology (202 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (115 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (24 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (29 citations). Manuela Kanat has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Markus Heinrichs, Gregor Domes, Ludger Tebartz van Elst, Ralf Schwarzwald, Irina Mader, Andreas Riedel, Helge Müller, Swantje Matthies, Alexandra Philipsen and Bernd Feige. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropsychopharmacology, BMC Geriatrics, Brain Research, BMJ Open and Age and Ageing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.