Manoel Cardozo

195 total papers · 435 total citations
30 papers, 54 citations indexed

About

Manoel Cardozo is a scholar working on Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science and Literature and Literary Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, Manoel Cardozo has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 54 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Anthropology, 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Literature and Literary Theory. Recurrent topics in Manoel Cardozo's work include History of Colonial Brazil (7 papers), Religion and Society in Latin America (3 papers) and Historical Studies on Spain (2 papers). Manoel Cardozo is often cited by papers focused on History of Colonial Brazil (7 papers), Religion and Society in Latin America (3 papers) and Historical Studies on Spain (2 papers). Manoel Cardozo collaborates with scholars based in United States. Manoel Cardozo's co-authors include Alexander Marchant, T. Lynn Smith and Pierre Chaunu and has published in prestigious journals such as Modern Language Journal, The American Historical Review and Hispanic American Historical Review.

In The Last Decade

Manoel Cardozo

16 papers receiving 33 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Manoel Cardozo	21	16	10	9	6	30	54
Luis Martínez‐Fernández	58 2.8×	21 1.3×	6 0.6×	5 0.6×	3 0.5×	24	86
Christian Høgsbjerg	49 2.3×	24 1.5×	12 1.2×	8 0.9×	5 0.8×	24	75
Peter White	15 0.7×	18 1.1×	6 0.6×	16 1.8×	4 0.7×	25	63
Bennett Zon	10 0.5×	9 0.6×	11 1.1×	5 0.6×	2 0.3×	28	52
Lucy Munro	12 0.6×	15 0.9×	16 1.6×	37 4.1×	3 0.5×	32	83
Nicolas Barker	9 0.4×	12 0.8×	21 2.1×	14 1.6×	4 0.7×	21	63
Aphra Behn	12 0.6×	10 0.6×	8 0.8×	25 2.8×	3 0.5×	22	43
Hugh F. Rankin	23 1.1×	16 1.0×	9 0.9×	6 0.7×	4 0.7×	32	75
Peter Ure	16 0.8×	7 0.4×	16 1.6×	27 3.0×	5 0.8×	33	73
Stanley Lane-Poole	26 1.2×	15 0.9×	11 1.1×	3 0.3×	4 0.7×	33	79

Countries citing papers authored by Manoel Cardozo

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Manoel Cardozo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Manoel Cardozo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Manoel Cardozo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Manoel Cardozo

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Manoel Cardozo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Manoel Cardozo. The network helps show where Manoel Cardozo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Manoel Cardozo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Manoel Cardozo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Manoel Cardozo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Manoel Cardozo. Manoel Cardozo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact