Malcolm Lidierth

816 citations
20 papers · 659 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Malcolm Lidierth

20 papers receiving 632 citations

Peers

Malcolm Lidierth
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Neurology 260
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 309
  • Sensory Systems 75
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 82
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 207
Replace Kris M. Horn with:
Kris M. Horn United States
P. A. Fortier Canada
M. Kato Japan
C. Compoint France
Jinzo Yamada Japan
Miguel Escudero Spain
Alberto Cangiano Italy
B. Anne Bannatyne United Kingdom
Hiromasa Kitazawa Japan
Hajime Mannen Japan
Malcolm Lidierth relative to Kris M. Horn United States Kris M. Horn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Kris M. Horn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm Lidierth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm Lidierth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm Lidierth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm Lidierth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm Lidierth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm Lidierth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm Lidierth. The network helps show where Malcolm Lidierth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm Lidierth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Malcolm Lidierth Line = papers co-authored together Malcolm Lidierth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200893
2 198890
3 198769
4 200451
5 200844
6 198842
7 199737
8 199035
9 198634
10 199927
11 199824
12 199023
13 199621
14 198919
15 200618
16 200716
17 20049
18 19915
19
Strychnine-sensitive mechanisms regulating primary afferent depolarization in the rat spinal cord
20051
20
Dorsal root potentials and intersegmental inhibition in the rat spinal cord
20051

About Malcolm Lidierth

Malcolm Lidierth is a scholar working on Neurology, Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 20 papers that have together received 659 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (7 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (7 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers) and Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (260 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (309 citations), Sensory Systems (75 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (82 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (207 citations). Malcolm Lidierth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Israel and Australia. Frequent co-authors include S. A. Edgley, Patrick D. Wall, David M. Armstrong, Richard Apps, Elizabeth J. Bradbury, Philip Duffy, Stephen B. McMahon, Sophie Pezet, Martyn G. Jones and William B.J. Cafferty. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physiology, Pain, Journal of Neurophysiology, Journal of Neuroscience and Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact