William B.J. Cafferty
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Developmental Neuroscience top 0.2%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 2%
- Physiology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Stephen M. StrittmatterStephen B. McMahonSteve ThompsonPhilip DuffyFabien MarchandJin QiuNatalie J. GardinerAaron W. McGee
- Topics
- Nerve injury and regeneration (27 papers)Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (19 papers)Spinal Cord Injury Research (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomIsrael
In The Last Decade
William B.J. Cafferty
40 papers receiving 3.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 2.2k
- Developmental Neuroscience 1.1k
- Molecular Biology 857
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 701
- Physiology 530
Countries citing papers authored by William B.J. Cafferty
This map shows the geographic impact of William B.J. Cafferty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William B.J. Cafferty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William B.J. Cafferty more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William B.J. Cafferty
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William B.J. Cafferty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William B.J. Cafferty. The network helps show where William B.J. Cafferty may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William B.J. Cafferty
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William B.J. Cafferty. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William B.J. Cafferty based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William B.J. Cafferty. William B.J. Cafferty is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 19 | |
| 3 | 24 | |
| 4 | 59 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 31 | |
| 7 | 52 | |
| 8 | 33 | |
| 9 | 57 | |
| 10 | 28 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 98 | |
| 13 | 66 | |
| 14 | 48 | |
| 15 | 194 | |
| 16 | 93 | |
| 17 | 183 | |
| 18 | 374 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | Leukemia inhibitory factor is a conditioning factor for regenerating adult sensory neurons | 2 |
About William B.J. Cafferty
William B.J. Cafferty is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 41 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (27 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (19 papers) and Spinal Cord Injury Research (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (1.1k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (2.2k citations) and Neurology (365 citations). William B.J. Cafferty has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Stephen M. Strittmatter, Stephen B. McMahon, Steve Thompson, Philip Duffy, Fabien Marchand, Jin Qiu, Natalie J. Gardiner, Aaron W. McGee, Eric A. Huebner and Betty P. Liu. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and Neuron.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.