Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity. Research and public policy
20031.4k citationsGriffith Edwards et al.profile →
Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity
2010925 citationsGriffith Edwards et al.Oxford University Press eBooksprofile →
Alcohol dependence: provisional description of a clinical syndrome.
1976837 citationsGriffith Edwards et al.BMJprofile →
Countries citing papers authored by Griffith Edwards
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Griffith Edwards's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Griffith Edwards with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Griffith Edwards more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Griffith Edwards
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Griffith Edwards. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Griffith Edwards. The network helps show where Griffith Edwards may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Griffith Edwards
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Griffith Edwards.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Griffith Edwards based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Griffith Edwards. Griffith Edwards is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Edwards, Griffith & Malcolm Lader. (1994). Addiction : processes of change. Oxford University Press eBooks.17 indexed citations
6.
Edwards, Griffith, John Strang, & Jerome H. Jaffe. (1993). Drugs, alcohol and tobacco: making the science and policy connections.. The International Islamic University Malaysia Repository (The International Islamic University Malaysia).14 indexed citations
7.
Lader, Malcolm, Griffith Edwards, & Colin Drummond. (1992). The Nature of alcohol and drug related problems. Cambridge University Press eBooks.67 indexed citations
8.
Edwards, Griffith & Malcolm Lader. (1990). The Nature of drug dependence. Oxford University Press eBooks.42 indexed citations
Edwards, Griffith, et al.. (1981). Drug problems in Britain : a review of ten years. Academic Press eBooks.50 indexed citations
13.
Ghodse, A. Hamid, Margaret Sheehan, Barbara C. Stevens, Celia Taylor, & Griffith Edwards. (1978). Mortality among drug addicts in Greater London.. BMJ. 2(6154). 1742–1744.21 indexed citations
14.
Edwards, Griffith & Marcus Grant. (1977). Alcoholism : new knowledge and new responses.109 indexed citations
15.
Edwards, Griffith & Jim Orford. (1977). Nutrition: Effects of Alcohol. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine. 70(5). 344–348.19 indexed citations
16.
Edwards, Griffith. (1976). Drugs and drug dependence.57 indexed citations
17.
Edwards, Griffith. (1974). Cannabis and the criteria for legalisation of a currently prohibited recreational drug: groundwork for a debate.. PubMed. 251. 1–62.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.