Maja Jørgensen
- Hematology top 5%
- Internal Medicine top 2%
- Surgery
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Co-authors
- Anna KlajnbardPal B. SzecsiNina Palmgren ColovSteen StenderMalene R. AndersenV. Bonnevie‐NielsenSixtus ThorsenNiels Bækgaard
- Topics
- Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (11 papers)Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (7 papers)Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- Denmark
In The Last Decade
Maja Jørgensen
17 papers receiving 583 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Hematology 295
- Internal Medicine 235
- Surgery 177
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 131
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 112
Countries citing papers authored by Maja Jørgensen
This map shows the geographic impact of Maja Jørgensen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maja Jørgensen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maja Jørgensen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Maja Jørgensen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maja Jørgensen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maja Jørgensen. The network helps show where Maja Jørgensen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maja Jørgensen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maja Jørgensen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maja Jørgensen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maja Jørgensen. Maja Jørgensen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | [Acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis should be treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis]. | 1 |
| 4 | 55 | |
| 5 | 32 | |
| 6 | 237 | |
| 7 | 93 | |
| 8 | [Endovascular treatment of chronic iliac vein obstruction in patients with venous claudication]. | 2 |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | [Local thrombolysis in proximal deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity]. | 4 |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 53 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 48 |
About Maja Jørgensen
Maja Jørgensen is a scholar working on Internal Medicine, Hematology and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 17 papers that have together received 617 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (11 papers), Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (7 papers) and Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (235 citations), Hematology (295 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (131 citations). Maja Jørgensen has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Anna Klajnbard, Pal B. Szecsi, Nina Palmgren Colov, Steen Stender, Malene R. Andersen, V. Bonnevie‐Nielsen, Sixtus Thorsen, Niels Bækgaard, Sven Just and Rikke Broholm. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Blood and Journal of Vascular Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.