Madeline N. Grant‐Hoffman
- Ecology top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Genetics
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change
- Co-authors
- Christa P. H. MulderPeter J. BellinghamDavid A. WardleTadashi FukamiDavid R. TownsKaren I. BonnerG. W. YeatesWendy M. Williamson
- Topics
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (13 papers)Rangeland and Wildlife Management (8 papers)Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNew ZealandSweden
In The Last Decade
Madeline N. Grant‐Hoffman
14 papers receiving 481 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Ecology 444
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 182
- Genetics 87
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 66
- Global and Planetary Change 64
Countries citing papers authored by Madeline N. Grant‐Hoffman
This map shows the geographic impact of Madeline N. Grant‐Hoffman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Madeline N. Grant‐Hoffman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Madeline N. Grant‐Hoffman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Madeline N. Grant‐Hoffman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Madeline N. Grant‐Hoffman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Madeline N. Grant‐Hoffman. The network helps show where Madeline N. Grant‐Hoffman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Madeline N. Grant‐Hoffman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Madeline N. Grant‐Hoffman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Madeline N. Grant‐Hoffman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Madeline N. Grant‐Hoffman. Madeline N. Grant‐Hoffman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 18 | |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | 40 | |
| 12 | 102 | |
| 13 | 293 | |
| 14 | 2 |
About Madeline N. Grant‐Hoffman
Madeline N. Grant‐Hoffman is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 14 papers that have together received 515 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (13 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (8 papers) and Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology (444 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (182 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (64 citations). Madeline N. Grant‐Hoffman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Christa P. H. Mulder, Peter J. Bellingham, David A. Wardle, Tadashi Fukami, David R. Towns, Karen I. Bonner, G. W. Yeates, Wendy M. Williamson, Perry S. Barboza and Peter Mueller. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology Letters, Oecologia and Biological Invasions.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.