Sara M. Galbraith

454 total citations
20 papers, 318 citations indexed

About

Sara M. Galbraith is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Sara M. Galbraith has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 318 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 9 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 7 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Sara M. Galbraith's work include Plant and animal studies (15 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (9 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (6 papers). Sara M. Galbraith is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (15 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (9 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (6 papers). Sara M. Galbraith collaborates with scholars based in United States, Costa Rica and Puerto Rico. Sara M. Galbraith's co-authors include James W. Rivers, James H. Cane, Andrew R. Moldenke, Nilsa A. Bosque‐Pérez, Lee A. Vierling, Jenny Ordóñez, Alexander K. Fremier, Urs G. Kormann, Cheryl B. Schultz and Sven Günter and has published in prestigious journals such as Oecologia, BioScience and Ecological Applications.

In The Last Decade

Sara M. Galbraith

19 papers receiving 317 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sara M. Galbraith United States 9 187 109 106 93 74 20 318
Rodrigo Martínez‐Sastre Spain 11 170 0.9× 139 1.3× 77 0.7× 79 0.8× 115 1.6× 16 407
Rainer M. Krug South Africa 10 90 0.5× 95 0.9× 240 2.3× 61 0.7× 103 1.4× 14 408
Rebecca K. Tonietto United States 9 306 1.6× 166 1.5× 159 1.5× 160 1.7× 114 1.5× 10 547
Amelia S. C. Hood United Kingdom 10 76 0.4× 32 0.3× 56 0.5× 64 0.7× 84 1.1× 22 272
Kong Luen Heong Philippines 15 153 0.8× 324 3.0× 38 0.4× 263 2.8× 69 0.9× 23 544
Sebastian Palmas United States 8 63 0.3× 121 1.1× 91 0.9× 140 1.5× 87 1.2× 11 433
Marjaana Toivonen Finland 11 182 1.0× 97 0.9× 117 1.1× 80 0.9× 66 0.9× 21 333
Katherine J. Turo United States 10 174 0.9× 88 0.8× 79 0.7× 70 0.8× 53 0.7× 14 293
Joseph Millard United Kingdom 7 175 0.9× 90 0.8× 96 0.9× 84 0.9× 71 1.0× 14 374
Sabrina S. Gavini Argentina 9 211 1.1× 83 0.8× 122 1.2× 122 1.3× 49 0.7× 16 298

Countries citing papers authored by Sara M. Galbraith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara M. Galbraith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara M. Galbraith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara M. Galbraith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara M. Galbraith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara M. Galbraith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara M. Galbraith. The network helps show where Sara M. Galbraith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sara M. Galbraith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sara M. Galbraith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sara M. Galbraith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sara M. Galbraith. Sara M. Galbraith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rivers, James W., et al.. (2025). Post-Wildfire Offspring Provisioning by a Solitary Bee is Dominated by Woody Pollen Sources and Uninfluenced by Wildfire Severity. Journal of Forestry. 124(1). 139–161. 1 indexed citations
3.
Ponisio, Lauren C., et al.. (2024). Host and floral communities shape parasite prevalence and reproduction in intensively managed forests. Ecosphere. 15(1). 4 indexed citations
4.
Thapa‐Magar, Khum Bahadur, Thomas Seth Davis, Sara M. Galbraith, & Madeline N. Grant‐Hoffman. (2023). Effects of Sage-Grouse Habitat Restoration Efforts on Pollination Networks in an Arid Ecosystem. Rangeland Ecology & Management. 91. 95–104. 2 indexed citations
5.
Galbraith, Sara M., Jonathon J. Valente, Christopher J. Dunn, & James W. Rivers. (2023). Both Landsat‐ and LiDAR‐derived measures predict forest bee response to large‐scale wildfire. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. 10(1). 24–38. 4 indexed citations
7.
Galbraith, Sara M., et al.. (2023). Bee diversity decreases rapidly with time since harvest in intensively managed conifer forests. Ecological Applications. 33(5). e2855–e2855. 24 indexed citations
8.
Galbraith, Sara M., James H. Cane, & James W. Rivers. (2021). Wildfire severity influences offspring sex ratio in a native solitary bee. Oecologia. 195(1). 65–75. 12 indexed citations
9.
Galbraith, Sara M., Terry Griswold, William J. Price, & Nilsa A. Bosque‐Pérez. (2020). Biodiversity and community composition of native bee populations vary among human-dominated land uses within the seasonally dry tropics. Journal of Insect Conservation. 24(6). 1045–1059. 7 indexed citations
10.
Galbraith, Sara M., James H. Cane, Andrew R. Moldenke, & James W. Rivers. (2019). Salvage logging reduces wild bee diversity, but not abundance, in severely burned mixed-conifer forest. Forest Ecology and Management. 453. 117622–117622. 23 indexed citations
11.
Galbraith, Sara M., et al.. (2019). Taxonomic Voucher Specimens for Study of Post-Wildfire Forest Habitat in Douglas County, Oregon. 3(4). 2 indexed citations
12.
Galbraith, Sara M., James H. Cane, Andrew R. Moldenke, & James W. Rivers. (2019). Wild bee diversity increases with local fire severity in a fire‐prone landscape. Ecosphere. 10(4). 62 indexed citations
13.
Rivers, James W., Sara M. Galbraith, James H. Cane, et al.. (2018). A Review of Research Needs for Pollinators in Managed Conifer Forests. Journal of Forestry. 116(6). 563–572. 38 indexed citations
14.
Galbraith, Sara M., et al.. (2018). La selección de lugares por apicultores de Costa Rica es influenciada por el uso de terreno, sus recursos florales y la calidad de la carretera. The Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico. 102(1-2). 21–37. 1 indexed citations
15.
Galbraith, Sara M., et al.. (2017). Local ecological knowledge reveals effects of policy-driven land use and cover change on beekeepers in Costa Rica. Land Use Policy. 69. 112–122. 21 indexed citations
16.
Bosque‐Pérez, Nilsa A., Jo Ellen Force, Lisette P. Waits, et al.. (2016). A model for team-based interdisciplinary doctoral education. Agritrop (Cirad). 1 indexed citations
17.
Fremier, Alexander K., Sven Günter, Lee A. Vierling, et al.. (2016). Scaling up functional traits for ecosystem services with remote sensing: concepts and methods. Ecology and Evolution. 6(13). 4359–4371. 48 indexed citations
18.
Bosque‐Pérez, Nilsa A., P. Zion Klos, Jo Ellen Force, et al.. (2016). A Pedagogical Model for Team-Based, Problem-Focused Interdisciplinary Doctoral Education. BioScience. 66(6). 477–488. 47 indexed citations
19.
Galbraith, Sara M., Lee A. Vierling, & Nilsa A. Bosque‐Pérez. (2015). Remote Sensing and Ecosystem Services: Current Status and Future Opportunities for the Study of Bees and Pollination-Related Services. Current Forestry Reports. 1(4). 261–274. 19 indexed citations
20.
Galbraith, Sara M., et al.. (2011). Cultivating Sustainability through Anthropology: University of Idaho's Campus Trash Project. Anthropology News. 52(4). 11–11. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026