M.Á. Ruiz

32 papers receiving 310 citations

Peers

M.Á. Ruiz
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Nephrology 45
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 88
  • Clinical Psychology 93
  • Applied Psychology 20
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 48
Replace Manuel Zamparini with:
Manuel Zamparini Italy
Emma H. Collette Netherlands
Stephen Lo United States
Carole Dembek United States
Petra Harris United Kingdom
Oren Meyers United States
S. Joseph India
Emmanouil Papastefanakis Greece
M.Á. Ruiz relative to Manuel Zamparini Italy Manuel Zamparini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Manuel Zamparini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.Á. Ruiz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.Á. Ruiz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.Á. Ruiz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.Á. Ruiz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.Á. Ruiz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.Á. Ruiz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.Á. Ruiz. The network helps show where M.Á. Ruiz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M.Á. Ruiz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.Á. Ruiz Line = papers co-authored together M.Á. Ruiz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199655
2 199828
3 201925
4 201622
5 201420
6
Design and validation of the "Quality of Life Questionnaire" ("Cuestionario de Calidad de Vida", CCV): A generic health-related perceived quality of life instrument.
199317
7 200416
8 199715
9 201112
10 201612
11 201410
12 199810
13 200810
14 20158
15 20118
16 20148
17 20127
18 20126
19 20166
20 20065

About M.Á. Ruiz

M.Á. Ruiz is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health, Nephrology and Oncology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies (6 papers), Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (5 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (3 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (3 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (45 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (88 citations), Clinical Psychology (93 citations), Applied Psychology (20 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (48 citations). M.Á. Ruiz has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Rocío Fernández Ballesteros, María Dolores Avia, Enrique Baca, María Crespo, Ana María Pérez García, Pilar Sanjuán, María Luisa Soriano González, Gonzalo Díaz-Soto, María Dolores Zamarrón and Juan Arrazola. Their work appears in journals such as The Spanish Journal of Psychology, International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, European Journal of Psychological Assessment, Behaviour Research and Therapy and American Journal of Roentgenology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact