M.A. Johnston

736 total citations
10 papers, 387 citations indexed

About

M.A. Johnston is a scholar working on Surgery, Language and Linguistics and Linguistics and Language. According to data from OpenAlex, M.A. Johnston has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 387 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Surgery, 3 papers in Language and Linguistics and 2 papers in Linguistics and Language. Recurrent topics in M.A. Johnston's work include EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (3 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (2 papers) and Multilingual Education and Policy (2 papers). M.A. Johnston is often cited by papers focused on EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (3 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (2 papers) and Multilingual Education and Policy (2 papers). M.A. Johnston collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. M.A. Johnston's co-authors include Manfred Pienemann, Geoff Brindley, Claire F. Smith, Derek Covill, Áine Burns, Barbara Thompson, David C. Wheeler, Michael Jarmulowicz, Jonathan Tibballs and P. Sweny and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Kidney Diseases, Studies in Second Language Acquisition and Anatomical Sciences Education.

In The Last Decade

M.A. Johnston

10 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M.A. Johnston United Kingdom 7 161 135 115 115 82 10 387
Nick Moore United Kingdom 8 47 0.3× 201 1.5× 96 0.8× 33 0.3× 57 0.7× 17 388
Peter Stray Jørgensen Denmark 6 10 0.1× 44 0.3× 37 0.3× 80 0.7× 21 0.3× 12 272
María Luz Germany 12 29 0.2× 44 0.3× 107 0.9× 5 0.0× 3 0.0× 51 313
John Barson United States 5 43 0.3× 15 0.1× 8 0.1× 28 0.2× 26 0.3× 9 144
Deborah Camp United States 5 186 1.2× 1 0.0× 28 0.2× 94 0.8× 127 1.5× 11 402
David A. Hernandez United States 7 7 0.0× 69 0.5× 99 0.9× 20 0.2× 12 0.1× 13 307
Jennifer Alter United States 5 30 0.2× 13 0.1× 207 1.8× 110 1.0× 6 348
George W Balfour United States 6 50 0.3× 81 0.7× 87 0.8× 3 0.0× 10 258
John Sulliván United States 8 13 0.1× 235 1.7× 202 1.8× 2 0.0× 2 0.0× 41 403
Marianne M. van den Hurk Netherlands 9 2 0.0× 86 0.6× 57 0.5× 64 0.6× 3 0.0× 12 294

Countries citing papers authored by M.A. Johnston

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.A. Johnston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.A. Johnston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.A. Johnston more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.A. Johnston

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.A. Johnston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.A. Johnston. The network helps show where M.A. Johnston may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M.A. Johnston

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M.A. Johnston. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M.A. Johnston based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M.A. Johnston. M.A. Johnston is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Smith, Claire F., et al.. (2024). “My Dead Body”: Development, production, and reception of a documentary that publicly displays the dissection of a human donor. Anatomical Sciences Education. 17(4). 749–762. 8 indexed citations
2.
Smith, Claire F., et al.. (2017). Take away body parts! An investigation into the use of 3D‐printed anatomical models in undergraduate anatomy education. Anatomical Sciences Education. 11(1). 44–53. 144 indexed citations
3.
Ritter, Jens Carsten, et al.. (2009). Aorto-gastroduodenal bypass grafting for an inferior pancreaticoduodenal aneurysm and celiac trunk thrombosis☆. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery. 10(1). 125–127. 14 indexed citations
4.
Thompson, Barbara, Edward Kingdon, M.A. Johnston, et al.. (2004). Transjugular kidney biopsy. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 43(4). 651–662. 44 indexed citations
5.
Pienemann, Manfred & M.A. Johnston. (1996). A brief history of processing approaches to SLA: reply to Mellow. Second language Research. 12(3). 319–334. 3 indexed citations
6.
Johnston, M.A.. (1994). Second Language Acquisition: A Classroom Perspective. Australian Studies in Language Acquisition No. 1.. 2 indexed citations
7.
Pienemann, Manfred, M.A. Johnston, & Jürgen M. Meisel. (1993). The Multidimensional Model, Linguistic Profiling, and Related Issues. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 15(4). 495–503. 9 indexed citations
8.
Pienemann, Manfred, M.A. Johnston, & Geoff Brindley. (1988). Constructing an Acquisition-Based Procedure for Second Language Assessment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 10(2). 217–243. 130 indexed citations
9.
Pienemann, Manfred & M.A. Johnston. (1986). An acquisition based procedure for second language assessment (ESL). Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. 9(1). 92–122. 27 indexed citations
10.
Johnston, M.A.. (1980). Second language learning in adults. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. 3(2). 90–121. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026