M. Visser
- Surgery top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Gastroenterology top 5%
- Oncology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Bas L. WeustenRoos E. PouwJacques BergmanF. van VilsterenFiebo ten KateLorenza Alvarez HerreroMark I. van Berge HenegouwenJJGHM Bergman
- Topics
- Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (18 papers)Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (14 papers)Esophageal and GI Pathology (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesPoland
In The Last Decade
M. Visser
28 papers receiving 856 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Surgery 626
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 489
- Gastroenterology 123
- Oncology 121
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 116
Countries citing papers authored by M. Visser
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Visser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Visser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Visser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Visser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Visser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Visser. The network helps show where M. Visser may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Visser
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Visser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Visser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Visser. M. Visser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 70 | |
| 9 | 210 | |
| 10 | 93 | |
| 11 | 35 | |
| 12 | 85 | |
| 13 | Risk of lymph node metastases in deeper invading early adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and cardia: a study based on endoscopic resection specimens | 1 |
| 14 | Body composition in the elderly: the influence of nutritional factors and physical activity. | 51 |
| 15 | 34 | |
| 16 | 116 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | [The significance of increased creatine-kinase activity in the serum of patients without primary neuromuscular disease]. | 2 |
About M. Visser
M. Visser is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Surgery, having authored 30 papers that have together received 878 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (18 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (14 papers) and Esophageal and GI Pathology (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (123 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (489 citations) and Surgery (626 citations). M. Visser has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Bas L. Weusten, Roos E. Pouw, Jacques Bergman, F. van Vilsteren, Fiebo ten Kate, Lorenza Alvarez Herrero, Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen, JJGHM Bergman, Paul Fockens and Karl C. Yu Kim Teng. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.