M. Tuke
- Surgery top 5%
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty 21
- Orthopedic Infections and Treatments 12
- Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes 9
- Hip disorders and treatments 4
- Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 4
- Oral Surgery top 5%
- Orthodontics top 10%
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 10%
- Foot and Ankle Surgery 3
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Bone Tissue Engineering Materials 4
-
- Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties 3
- Co-authors
- William L. WalterP.J. GregsonA. WisbeyGerard InsleyMichael FreemanLaurence M. PeterPeter A. RevellB. Zicat
- Cited by
- SurgeryOral SurgeryOrthodontics
- Journals
- The Journal of Arthroplasty (4 papers)Biomaterials (2 papers)Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
M. Tuke
27 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Surgery 916
- Oral Surgery 87
- Orthodontics 44
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 85
- Biomedical Engineering 286
Countries citing papers authored by M. Tuke
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Tuke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Tuke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Tuke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Tuke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Tuke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Tuke. The network helps show where M. Tuke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Tuke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 56 | |
| 3 | RETRIEVAL ANALYSIS OF SQUEAKING ALUMINA CERAMIC-ON-CERAMIC BEARINGS. | 2009 | 1 |
| 4 | 2008 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 98 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 72 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 168 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 11 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 17 | |
| 11 | 1991 | 120 | |
| 12 | 1991 | 124 | |
| 13 | 1991 | 12 | |
| 14 | 1989 | 54 | |
| 15 | 1987 | 95 | |
| 16 | 1983 | 12 | |
| 17 | 1982 | 20 | |
| 18 | 1981 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1978 | 13 | |
| 20 | Engineering considerations in the design of an ankle joint. | 1975 | 38 |
About M. Tuke
M. Tuke is a scholar working on Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Rehabilitation, Oral Surgery and Orthodontics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (21 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (12 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (9 papers), Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (4 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (4 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (4 papers), Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties (3 papers) and Foot and Ankle Surgery (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (916 citations), Oral Surgery (87 citations), Orthodontics (44 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (85 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (286 citations). M. Tuke has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include William L. Walter, P.J. Gregson, A. Wisbey, Gerard Insley, Michael Freeman, Laurence M. Peter, Peter A. Revell, B. Zicat, M. A. R. Freeman and Steven M. Kurtz. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Arthroplasty, Biomaterials, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, International Orthopaedics and Journal of Biomedical Materials Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.