M. Specht
Impact in
-
- Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
- Nephrology top 5%
- Renal function and acid-base balance
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Renal function and acid-base balance 8
-
- Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders 5
- Co-authors
- L. Hannemann (15 shared papers)Claudia Spies (12 shared papers)Andreas Meier‐Hellmann (9 shared papers)Konrad Reinhart (8 shared papers)Donald L. Bredle (5 shared papers)C. Müller (3 shared papers)Hans Rommelspacher (4 shared papers)H. W. Striebel (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Intensive Care Medicine (5 papers)Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica (2 papers)British Journal of Anaesthesia (2 papers)Advances in experimental medicine and biology (2 papers)Anesthesiology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesBrazil
In The Last Decade
M. Specht
27 papers receiving 752 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 146
- Nephrology 117
- Neurology 210
- Emergency Medicine 91
- Epidemiology 267
Countries citing papers authored by M. Specht
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Specht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Specht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Specht more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Specht
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Specht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Specht. The network helps show where M. Specht may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Specht, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 128 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 104 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 91 | |
| 4 | 1997 | 86 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 67 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 66 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 54 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 36 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 34 | |
| 10 | 1988 | 20 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 19 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 12 | |
| 13 | 1994 | 10 | |
| 14 | 1991 | 8 | |
| 15 | 1995 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1998 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1996 | 6 | |
| 18 | 1993 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 4 |
About M. Specht
M. Specht is a scholar working on Nephrology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Epidemiology, Surgery and Neurology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 782 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renal function and acid-base balance (8 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (7 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (5 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (3 papers), Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (3 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (146 citations), Nephrology (117 citations), Neurology (210 citations), Emergency Medicine (91 citations) and Epidemiology (267 citations). M. Specht has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include L. Hannemann, Claudia Spies, Andreas Meier‐Hellmann, Konrad Reinhart, Donald L. Bredle, C. Müller, Hans Rommelspacher, H. W. Striebel, W. Schaffartzik and Tim Neumann. Their work appears in journals such as Intensive Care Medicine, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Advances in experimental medicine and biology and Anesthesiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.