M. S. O'Mahony
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 0.2%
- Physiology top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Oncology top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ken WoodhouseRuth E. HubbardEleri DaviesPhilip A. RoutledgeBrian L. CalverK.W. WoodhouseMark KinironsGeorge M. Savva
- Topics
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers)Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (5 papers)Frailty in Older Adults (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaCanada
In The Last Decade
M. S. O'Mahony
29 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 1.1k
- Physiology 524
- Economics and Econometrics 523
- Oncology 287
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 283
Countries citing papers authored by M. S. O'Mahony
This map shows the geographic impact of M. S. O'Mahony's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. S. O'Mahony with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. S. O'Mahony more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. S. O'Mahony
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. S. O'Mahony. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. S. O'Mahony. The network helps show where M. S. O'Mahony may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. S. O'Mahony
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. S. O'Mahony. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. S. O'Mahony based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. S. O'Mahony. M. S. O'Mahony is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | Frailty and illness severity in relation to delirium in older inpatients | 2 |
| 3 | 153 | |
| 4 | 26 | |
| 5 | 84 | |
| 6 | 87 | |
| 7 | 99 | |
| 8 | 107 | |
| 9 | 69 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 162 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 341 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 32 | |
| 20 | 13 |
About M. S. O'Mahony
M. S. O'Mahony is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Family Practice, having authored 30 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (5 papers) and Frailty in Older Adults (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (1.1k citations), Family Practice (135 citations) and Toxicology (200 citations). M. S. O'Mahony has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ken Woodhouse, Ruth E. Hubbard, Eleri Davies, Philip A. Routledge, Brian L. Calver, K.W. Woodhouse, Mark Kinirons, George M. Savva, Preeti Gupta and Gary Middleton. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society and Pharmacology & Therapeutics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.