M. R. Pearson

152 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

M. R. Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 547
  • Radiation 213
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 755
  • Mechanics of Materials 545
  • Spectroscopy 328
Replace Ya. E. Krasik with:
Ya. E. Krasik Israel
Hirofumi Watanabe Japan
Thomas Beier Germany
J.A. Leavitt United States
G. Müller Germany
Aici Qiu China
M. Kröning Germany
M. Zakaullah Pakistan
A. Yamamoto Japan
Shin Kajita Japan
M. R. Pearson relative to Ya. E. Krasik Israel Ya. E. Krasik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.6×
Ya. E. Krasik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. R. Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. R. Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. R. Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. R. Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. R. Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. R. Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. R. Pearson. The network helps show where M. R. Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. R. Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. R. Pearson Line = papers co-authored together M. R. Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20241
3 20230
4 20231
5 20233
6 20231
7 20194
8
Isotope shifts in the 7 S -> 8 S transition of francium: measurements and comparison to ab-initio theory
20171
9 201663
10 201526
11 201517
12 201415
13
Approaches to Acoustic Emission Monitoring with Applicability to Key Components in Wind Turbines
20132
14 201327
15 20125
16 201131
17 200844
18 200727
19 200673
20 19957

About M. R. Pearson

M. R. Pearson is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy and Radiation, having authored 153 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Molecular Physics (35 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (33 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (23 papers), Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation (22 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (22 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (16 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (14 papers) and Structural Health Monitoring Techniques (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (547 citations), Radiation (213 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (755 citations), Mechanics of Materials (545 citations) and Spectroscopy (328 citations). M. R. Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rhys Pullin, Mark Eaton, Karen M. Holford, Safaa Kh. Al-Jumaili, Carol Featherston, C. D. P. Levy, W. A. MacFarlane, Davide Crivelli, R. F. Kiefl and G. D. Morris. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review B, Physical Review Letters, Physica B Condensed Matter, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026